I've read a lot of posts saying that this player and that player are not a Philbin's "type of guy" and just wonder with Tannanbaum, Hickey, etc., how much say he has on player decisions?
Anyone know?
you have it backwards. That's why he is still here.if it was a bad move, Philbin was 100% at fault. if it was a good move, he had nothing to do with it.
how much say he has on player decisions?
Anyone know?
Take your pick.
Half of FH says he is the reason Reggie, Dansby, etc are no longer with the team. Yet, he couldnt get Irish to bring in Albert.
:idk:
It's a lot easier to get rid of someone than it is to bring someone in... If you believe Philbin desperately wanted Albert, the mere fact that the trade negotiations got as far as they did points to Philbin's influence.
The coach obviously influences the construction of the roster, good and bad. It would be illogical to believe otherwise.
It would also be illogical to believe he got rid of Jake Long when the Dolphins offered Long more money than St. Louis did.
Queue the "Long didn't want to play for Philbin" crowd. We made out in that scenario...Long has been a disaster for the Rams and a key reason why Bradford can't finish a season.