How Ridiculous Tyreek Is:

[Mike McDaniel]

The NFL is not who gives the awards, but I get your point.

Like I said before, it is called the "most valuable player", not the "best player".

The name of the award itself is what it is. Does the QB position have an inherent advantage? Sure, it is the most important position on the field, and therefore in most years a QB will win the award.

Unless you want to change the definition of "most valuable", not sure why this is so hotly debated.

“Most Valuable” can be interpreted in a lot of ways actually. It’s clear the original intent of the award was to award it to the best player, not some silly idea of “most value a player brings to their individual team”

 

[Mach2]

“Most Valuable” can be interpreted in a lot of ways actually. It’s clear the original intent of the award was to award it to the best player, not some silly idea of “most value a player brings to their individual team”

Clear? But can be interpreted in many different ways?

Those two statements are opposed to each other.

The history of the award would indicate it is most valuable to their team, if anything. That is evidenced by the fact that the overwhelming majority in the modern era have been won by QBs.

 

[roy_miami]

Dude said 2k. He sure as **** wasn't lying.

He's on pace with the 17 game season but would be just shy at this pace if it were a 16 game season.

 

[E30M3]

He's on pace with the 17 game season but would be just shy at this pace if it were a 16 game season.

But.... its not a 16 game season anymore. Seems convenient to apply that logic now, but not other stats eh?