I love Mando’s first three picks...

[dolphinheel]

Load up on the best offensive skill players available, although I’d prefer a pass rusher/L late second. No mention of an olineman. Wonder why that is? Could it be we aren’t taking an OT in 1st and 2nd, grabbing one later and an OC in FA? Probably

https://www.miamiherald.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/armando-salguero/article249159350.html

 

[hoops]

My favorite value pick is friermuth in terms of what he got and where he got it

 

[Church95]

 

[Kebo]

Mando knocked it out of the park. Great draft!

 

[CedarPhin]

I’d be more than happy with that.

 

[dolphinheel]

Mando knocked it out of the park. Great draft!

Absolutely and fill in the gaps with 3rd -7th and FAs. With what we already have we would instantly be a dynamic offense.

 

[AdamD13]

The best part was him continually referring to himself as “fake GM Mando”

Fake Finheaven Administrator AdamD13 thinks everyone posting about what the Dolphins should do moving forward must refer to themselves as “fake GM”, “fake HC”, “fake Co-OC” appropriate to the context of their post before stating their opinion.

 

[Kebo]

I don’t think we could do any better than this.

 

[3rdandinches]

View attachment 65650

I don’t think we could do any better than this.

We could do better....by adding L.David ILB and J.Simmons S in FA!!!

 

[Geordie]

If we are loading up on receivers in round one then I think Pitts plus one of the 3 Blue chips (Chase/Smith and Waddle) is a better combo. I have a hard time imagining that all three of those will be gone by 18 but if that's in doubt trade back from 3 and up from 18 will secure both players. Williams in the 2nd round is definitely a target but I think you can get a comparable skill set for Bateman in later picks, here's what I would do:

3. Pitts
18. Smith (most likely to drop because of the frame concerns)
36. Williams (unless Harris is there)
50. Dickerson (if he passes health checks, if not Humphrey or Radunz)
81. Eskridge (if there, if not Rodgers/Atwell/E Moore/ R Moore/Wallace/St. Brown)

We aren't the Panthers though and totally unlikely to stack up on one side of the ball, so I'm expecting 18 or 36 or both to be D players. Which means we have to trade back a bit for more capital.

 

[John813]

I mean I get adding more WR talent, as that was a weak spot for the team this year, but more than likely we won't be getting instant production from both right away. Smith? Sure, but not every year do you see guys like CeeDee Lamb and Justin Jefferson type instant production from rookies imo.

 

[Fin-Loco]

I like pick one and three. I kinda like the Bateman pick but there I'd be targeting also Pitts, Waddle and maybe Toney. Not saying Bateman isn't the right guy but dang would Pitts be nice.

 

[DZimmer000]

Paywall.....Can someone please post his draft?

 

[dolphinheel]

View attachment 65650

I don’t think we could do any better than this.

So looks like you traded down to 7 for another 2nd?

 

[juniorseau55]

If we are loading up on receivers in round one then I think Pitts plus one of the 3 Blue chips (Chase/Smith and Waddle) is a better combo. I have a hard time imagining that all three of those will be gone by 18 but if that's in doubt trade back from 3 and up from 18 will secure both players. Williams in the 2nd round is definitely a target but I think you can get a comparable skill set for Bateman in later picks, here's what I would do:

3. Pitts
18. Smith (most likely to drop because of the frame concerns)
36. Williams (unless Harris is there)
50. Dickerson (if he passes health checks, if not Humphrey or Radunz)
81. Eskridge (if there, if not Rodgers/Atwell/E Moore/ R Moore/Wallace/St. Brown)

We aren't the Panthers though and totally unlikely to stack up on one side of the ball, so I'm expecting 18 or 36 or both to be D players. Which means we have to trade back a bit for more capital.

Only the giants would pick Pitts that high.