Inside the numbers - Ryan Tannehill's last 15 starts | Page 6 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Inside the numbers - Ryan Tannehill's last 15 starts

20080202231407Beatingadeadhorse-1.gif
 
His stats vs. Buffalo speak for themselves

Now it's 1-4 vs. Buffalo

11/15/12 14-28 141 1 TD 2 INT 46.9 QBR 50.0% CMP
12/23/12 13-25 130 2 TD 0 INT 93.8 QBR 52.0% CMP
10/20/13 19-37 194 3 TD 2 INT 71.2 QBR 51.4% CMP
12/22/13 10-27 82 0 TD 0 INT 45.6 QBR 37% CMP
09/14/14 31-49 241 1 TD 1 INT 73.6 QBR 63.3% CMP

Next! Draft another one
 
Why does the OP only use the last 15 games? is that the sample size that fits an agenda, or is there some logical reasoning as to why 15 games was picked?
 
flynryan15 said:
Rough math what's he average a rating if around 65 in inner division play?
Click to expand...

And this is why things will get worse before they get better.

As you can see, teams who have more familiarity with Tannehill, seem to shut him down. Each of the divisional teams have ONE game against Tannehill where he performed well against them.

If you look at last years performances, the Phins started off with a 3 game win streak. This was Sherman masking some of Tannehill's weaknesses early on. Then the Phins went on a 4 game losing streak, broken only by a 22-20 win vs. Cinci where the defense DOMINATED Andy Dalton. Tannehill was garbage in that game. The Phins then continued to lose after that game. After that horrible run, Sherman polished up a turd a little bit and the Phins were able to go on a 3 game win streak thanks to a few wrinkles to mask the stench of Tannehill. Since then, Tannehill has played horribly vs. 4 straight divisional opponents.

The more film that is out there, the worse it is going to get. Luckily, the Phins play 2 opponents the next couple of weeks who are unfamiliar with Tannehill. Well, that might be a bad thing because it might result in us sticking with Tannehill a bit longer. The rough patches are still coming and they will only get worse the deeper we get.
 
Matt Moore does not give the team the best chance to win. But I agree Tannehill is not the answer long term.
 
Zounds said:
Why does the OP only use the last 15 games? is that the sample size that fits an agenda, or is there some logical reasoning as to why 15 games was picked?
Click to expand...

The stats start right after our 3-0 start last year. We are 6-9 in those 15 games.
 
WVDolphan said:
And this is why things will get worse before they get better.

As you can see, teams who have more familiarity with Tannehill, seem to shut him down. Each of the divisional teams have ONE game against Tannehill where he performed well against them.

If you look at last years performances, the Phins started off with a 3 game win streak. This was Sherman masking some of Tannehill's weaknesses early on. Then the Phins went on a 4 game losing streak, broken only by a 22-20 win vs. Cinci where the defense DOMINATED Andy Dalton. Tannehill was garbage in that game. The Phins then continued to lose after that game. After that horrible run, Sherman polished up a turd a little bit and the Phins were able to go on a 3 game win streak thanks to a few wrinkles to mask the stench of Tannehill. Since then, Tannehill has played horribly vs. 4 straight divisional opponents.

The more film that is out there, the worse it is going to get. Luckily, the Phins play 2 opponents the next couple of weeks who are unfamiliar with Tannehill. Well, that might be a bad thing because it might result in us sticking with Tannehill a bit longer. The rough patches are still coming and they will only get worse the deeper we get.
Click to expand...

the problem is wv, just like henne, they r scared to pull the qb.

lets remember, henne did not get benched for bad play, he got hurt vs san diego and had to leave the game, the only reason y moore was put in, in favor of henne.

if henne had not gotten hurt, well we would have had andrew luck, lol.

basically, tannehill, unfortunately, will only go to the bench because of injury, not because of bad play.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom