It is partially a product of talent evaluation and accumulation. But, it seems to me that Belichick puts a premium on having a large number of LB's (guys in the 240-250 range) - tweener types. They are big OLB's who can also rush, but are still more LB than DE. He usually has 8-9 on them. In fact, in the SB against Philly, Belichick often went with 2 DT's and 5 LB's for his front 7 on D.
Saban, has only 6 true LB's on the team and 10 DL's. All the D-linemen are big except for Taylor and Bowens. Both of them can play in a 2 point stance, but are not natural's in space.
Another interesting difference is that Belichick tends to go with lighter O-linemen whereas Saban has accumulated a bevy of behemoths! The smallest guy on our starting OL is 320 and we have two guys who go at least 345.
Again, part of that may be a product of available talent or, in part, O-line coaching philosophy (Houck has tended to have giant OL's in the past - see San Diego and Dallas). But, it will be interesting to see if the two coaches diverge in the future or how they continue to evolve.
Saban, has only 6 true LB's on the team and 10 DL's. All the D-linemen are big except for Taylor and Bowens. Both of them can play in a 2 point stance, but are not natural's in space.
Another interesting difference is that Belichick tends to go with lighter O-linemen whereas Saban has accumulated a bevy of behemoths! The smallest guy on our starting OL is 320 and we have two guys who go at least 345.
Again, part of that may be a product of available talent or, in part, O-line coaching philosophy (Houck has tended to have giant OL's in the past - see San Diego and Dallas). But, it will be interesting to see if the two coaches diverge in the future or how they continue to evolve.