Dmarino110
Starter
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2005
- Messages
- 2,258
- Reaction score
- 160
ill st this point #1, if the tannehill to wallace deep conncection does not happen this year at least 6-7 times we need to cut our losses on one of them. either tannehill cannot throw the deep ball that was surprisingly the only ball henne was good at when he was with us, or wallace is only good for perfect passes on broken plays...
neither is a very good option. thill should be able to throw a deep ball accurately and wallace should fight to help his QB...
IMO until the connection finally happens wallace is a distraction. he keeps a safety a little further to his side of the field and helps open up the rest of the field for other WRs...as good as that may be, its not worth the money we pay him...
just think what happens to wallace this year if belicheat puts revis on a different receiver...
neither is a very good option. thill should be able to throw a deep ball accurately and wallace should fight to help his QB...
IMO until the connection finally happens wallace is a distraction. he keeps a safety a little further to his side of the field and helps open up the rest of the field for other WRs...as good as that may be, its not worth the money we pay him...
just think what happens to wallace this year if belicheat puts revis on a different receiver...