<O>
☠️ Banned ☠️
This is more for fun than anything else, but there was a stretch of the game yesterday that lasted nearly a half, in which the Dolphins played like a team that would be expected to finish a season with a 15-1 record.
Let me explain.
In the second half, Matt Moore's passer rating was 106.5.
Ryan Fitzpatrick's was 68.8.
That of course means the Dolphins' passing offense was playing very well, and its defense was playing very well against the opposing passing offense.
Based on league data from 2014 to 2016, every 5.65 points of advantage between offensive passer rating and defensive passer rating surrendered (i.e., passer rating differential) equals one expected win on a season.
During the second half yesterday, the Dolphins' passer rating differential was a whopping +37.6.
37.6/5.65 = 6.65
(For comparison's sake, the 2016 Patriots, who finished 14-2 and won the Super Bowl, had a passer rating differential of +25.1 on the season.)
The average team in the league is of course expected to finish 8-8. A team with 6.65 additional wins, rounding up to 7, would naturally finish 15-1.
So here's the question to ponder and respond to if you'd like: if this team is truly toast, why can it play for an entire half of football like a team that would be expected to finish 15-1, even when it's down 20-7 on the scoreboard and there appears to be no overwhelming motive to do so?
Take a look through the forum at the criticism of various parts of the team, from the owner all the way to the ballboy.
If those parts of the team truly make it terrible, how did it play like a 15-1 team for an entire half, when it could've just as easily packed up and quit?
What about the team made that happen, and why can't it be present for 60 minutes week in week out?
Let me explain.
In the second half, Matt Moore's passer rating was 106.5.
Ryan Fitzpatrick's was 68.8.
That of course means the Dolphins' passing offense was playing very well, and its defense was playing very well against the opposing passing offense.
Based on league data from 2014 to 2016, every 5.65 points of advantage between offensive passer rating and defensive passer rating surrendered (i.e., passer rating differential) equals one expected win on a season.
During the second half yesterday, the Dolphins' passer rating differential was a whopping +37.6.
37.6/5.65 = 6.65
(For comparison's sake, the 2016 Patriots, who finished 14-2 and won the Super Bowl, had a passer rating differential of +25.1 on the season.)
The average team in the league is of course expected to finish 8-8. A team with 6.65 additional wins, rounding up to 7, would naturally finish 15-1.
So here's the question to ponder and respond to if you'd like: if this team is truly toast, why can it play for an entire half of football like a team that would be expected to finish 15-1, even when it's down 20-7 on the scoreboard and there appears to be no overwhelming motive to do so?
Take a look through the forum at the criticism of various parts of the team, from the owner all the way to the ballboy.
If those parts of the team truly make it terrible, how did it play like a 15-1 team for an entire half, when it could've just as easily packed up and quit?
What about the team made that happen, and why can't it be present for 60 minutes week in week out?