Jarvis and Parker so far... | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Jarvis and Parker so far...

Phinz1972

Phinz1972

Make me a sammich
Joined
Sep 16, 2003
Messages
2,254
Reaction score
313
Location
York, Pa
Based upon on the field play so far(say that because I know some will factor in the video tape of Landry and his girl), who would you guys prefer the team keep? In sense of sign Landry to new contract or save money for Parker. I'm aware early in the season so far, but one can only take so much Jay Cutler talk lol.

Personally, if Jarvis got credit for being heart of team last season, then he deserves some judgement for not being heart this year thus far. Overall, I rather trade Jarvis and get a pick or two, package that with our 1st rounder this year and move up(if we aren't already top 5 picking) to draft a QB from this upcoming class and have a plan in the wings for after Tannehill/if he isn't the same. Parker is showing he can reach the heights the scouts thought he would when drafted, rather take the risk on him and perhaps get a QB of the future over flushing all the money into Jarvis.
 
Last edited:
Even though he still isn't that "alpha male" receiver, DVP over Landry.

Unlike Landry, he has room before he hits his ceiling *and* he typically isn't on the verge of a stupid penalty.
 
stills has to be the odd man out when DVP is up to get paid
 
Michael Scott said:
This. I like Stills but he'd be super easy to replace. You can find a Kenny Stills in the mid rounds on a cheap rookie deal.
Click to expand...
Keep Stills. Who do we have with his skill set?Who did we have since Duper. He is not easily replaced. And please don't bring up Grant. Two deep catches against second stringers late in a meaningless game, don't count in my book. Stills is a good citizen, took a home town discount, positive influence in a locker room....ah, I know now, all these positive traits do not count in Madden.
 
Last edited:
Yea, rather move Stills than DVP or Landry.

But, between Parker and Landry, I'll take Parker.
 
It depends on who the QB will be down the road.

If it's Tannehill it doesn't really matter much because he can't hit anybody in stride anyway.

If we draft saayyyy.....Baker Mayfield, we want to prioritize Landry. Mayfield can extend plays like few before him. He would be murder with a guy Landry that keeps going 110% past the whistle.

Tannehill gives up on pass plays right away so you see Stills and Parker just standing still after 2-3 seconds into a play. You just can't win like that.
 
Some of yall kill me with this crap. You wanna trade stills? A guy who was our biggest producer last year with a healthy tannehill? No freaking way. Haven't yall learned already you can just keep giving away your talent. Jarvis had what, 2 or 3 tds last year. Stills had what around 10. Yeah let's trade stills. Yall are rediculous
 
Kingdom Come said:
It depends on who the QB will be down the road.

If it's Tannehill it doesn't really matter much because he can't hit anybody in stride anyway.

If we draft saayyyy.....Baker Mayfield, we want to prioritize Landry. Mayfield can extend plays like few before him. He would be murder with a guy Landry that keeps going 110% past the whistle.

Tannehill gives up on pass plays right away so you see Stills and Parker just standing still after 2-3 seconds into a play. You just can't win like that.
Click to expand...

"Let's make things up for $500 Alex."
 
I do think you move on from kenny if you have to make that call at the time. And I'm in big Stills fan.
 
If the reality is that we can't keep 3 high-priced receivers, then I would trade the one that gives us the best return. Reasoning: I would rather get something instead of losing one for nothing. If Landry can land us a 1st or 2 seconds or 2,3 & 4 I would take that trade rather than lose without any return. We could use as many draft picks as we can get to shore up our team (TE, CB, DE LG, C, RG, LB, punter).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom