Jason Cole: Dolphins concerned about Tannehill | Page 26 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Jason Cole: Dolphins concerned about Tannehill

Nawledge said:
Actually...based on Tom Brady's percentage it's not really necessary. Playoffs every year yet below average.
Click to expand...

That's the cherry pick that I'm talking about and it's almost discrediting all the other things Brady does do better to mask his average deep ball.
 
nyjunc said:
Pull up the thread.
Click to expand...

Not a chance am I tracking down a thread you clearly remember just so you can deny, deflect, deceive, etc.

You actually tried to deflect by saying that "nobody" doesn't mean "not one person"...WTF?
 
enigmatics said:
That's the cherry pick that I'm talking about and it's almost discrediting all the other things Brady does do better to mask his average deep ball.
Click to expand...

outside of Moss for a year or 2 what other legit deep threat has he thrown to in his career?

---------- Post added at 03:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:01 PM ----------
FinfanInBuffalo said:
Not a chance am I tracking down a thread you clearly remember just so you can deny, deflect, deceive, etc.

You actually tried to deflect by saying that "nobody" doesn't mean "not one person"...WTF?
Click to expand...

I think that goes w/o saying when someone says "no one" it doesn't mean literally not one single person. That issue is on you and I applaud you for doing a great job deflecting.
 
Wildbill3 said:
some of us maintained the OLine was a problem the entire year, and we were winning despite it's shortcomings. I just didn't bother crying about it game after game because it was too ****ing obvious the oline was a huge problem.
Click to expand...

There was a thread specifically about the problems with the OL in the evening right after the NE game. He knows this, I posted the link. He is lying.
 
Ballerinaspinninganimatedgif-1.gif


nyjunc said:
just so we are clear, you brought up Mark not me.

I just checked your post history, there is a gap for a few weeks. it's not rocket science but you always deflect your stalking ways.

stop worrying about meaningless rankings. Both mark and Ryan failed to end '11 and '13, the difference was Ryan's D played much better and gave Miami a chance and mark at his worst late in the year led his O to much more points than Ryan.
Click to expand...

just so we're clear, we don't operate in a bubble.... anyone who disagrees that the 28th ranked QB in a particular year was ever a top 10, unless they're a hard wired Pavlovian, should take your opinion on that QB, our QB and any other QB with a grain of salt. And if you believe the '11 buttfumble, who couldn't even beat 1 winning team (and only 5 in 4 years) and blew the last 3 games to losing teams was "middle of the road" then Tannehill who had better stats, beat winning teams including critical game 14, and had the 29th avg worst OL in the league according to 5 independent analytical sources as born out by the 6 sacks in Buffalo, was even better than that in '13.

note that a generous PFF at 21 overall, ups that 29th best avg. And FWIW, PFF put the '12 version of buttfumble's OL at #3 and Football Outsiders at #16, If Tannehill had the '12 jets OL, it wouldn't have come down to the 15th and 16th game despite losing the '12 most clutch receiver in the league in game 6.

But I did notice that your boss must have been in all last week


2q86lfq-1.jpg


Please stop providing fantasy meaningless numbers for a QB who Westhoff called an incidental passenger and stop stalking me.
 
nyjunc said:
outside of Moss for a year or 2 what other legit deep threat has he thrown to in his career?
Click to expand...


He never really had one. They spread people out and confused defenses, leaving Tom to surgically carve them with screen passes and shots down the seam to his TE's.
 
enigmatics said:
I read the wrong chart. How dare I! You've never screwed up reading anything in your life right? :lol:
Click to expand...

That's not the point. The point is the sequence went like this:

Ah HAAAAAAAA - here is a chart showing Tannehill is below average on deep balls!!!!!!

You read the chart wrong, it says he is average.

Oh, well is doesn't matter then.
 
7BXuElm-1.gif
 
AphexPhin said:
can the mods please just ban junc once and for all? I mean, why the hell is he here? This thread in particular is about Tannehill and the Fins...not the Jets. smdh
Click to expand...

do yourself a favor and se who brought up the Jets. Thanks for your time.

---------- Post added at 03:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:13 PM ----------
FinfanInBuffalo said:
Hey, it is easy to win arguments when you can just change the meaning of words.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/no%20one?s=t
Click to expand...

keep deflecting.
 
Vaark said:
[/img]



just so we're clear, we don't operate in a bubble.... anyone who disagrees that the 28th ranked QB in a particular year was ever a top 10, unless they're a hard wired Pavlovian, should take your opinion on that QB, our QB and any other QB with a grain of salt. And if you believe the '11 buttfumble, who couldn't even beat 1 winning team (and only 5 in 4 years) and blew the last 3 games to losing teams was "middle of the road" then Tannehill who had better stats, beat winning teams including critical game 14, and had the 29th avg worst OL in the league according to 5 independent analytical sources as born out by the 6 sacks in Buffalo, was even better than that in '13.

note that a generous PFF at 21 overall, ups that 29th best avg. And FWIW, PFF put the '12 version of buttfumble's OL at #3 and Football Outsiders at #16, If Tannehill had the '12 jets OL, it wouldn't have come down to the 15th and 16th game despite losing the '12 most clutch receiver in the league in game 6.

But I did notice that your boss must have been in all last week


[/img]

Please stop providing fantasy meaningless numbers for a QB who Westhoff called an incidental passenger and stop stalking me.
Click to expand...

what is funny is you said he was 12-14 in 2010. You post so many lies you don't even realize when you do it.

Mark was bad the last 3 games but how did he blow it? the D allowed 31 PPG, Miami's D allowed 19.5.


keep posting #s and rankings you don't understand(and quotes you don't understand). They really help you:lol:
 
nyjunc said:
just so we are clear, you brought up Mark not me.

I just checked your post history, there is a gap for a few weeks. it's not rocket science but you always deflect your stalking ways.

stop worrying about meaningless rankings. Both mark and Ryan failed to end '11 and '13, the difference was Ryan's D played much better and gave Miami a chance and mark at his worst late in the year led his O to much more points than Ryan.
Click to expand...


:bobdole: Wow!!!
 
tay0365 said:
:bobdole: Wow!!!
Click to expand...

so your D didn't keep you in both the Buf and NYJ games? for as bad as Buf dominated your O you were only down 10 in the 4th qtr. they only allowed 1 TD against Buf and forced Buf to settle for FGs giving Miami a chance.

against us they weren't great but they only allowed 20 pts.

you can win games allowing 20 and 19 pts all the time, it's impossible to win scoring zero and hard to win scoring 7.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom