Jay Ajayi is only running 3 yards for every yard he gains. | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Jay Ajayi is only running 3 yards for every yard he gains.

LikeUntoGod

The Oracle
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,339
Reaction score
61
Age
64
Location
Gainesville Florida
The first thing you need to know is that 3 yards for every yard made is a low ratio.

This is what I meant when I said he was a North-South runner with a little wiggle.

"He was a straight-line runner with size and speed," said an NFC scout who scouted Ajayi at Boise State. "I didn't expect him to light up the league like this, but he did have feet and hips. ... I thought he would be a one-cut slasher with the potential to be a solid starter."

As a straight-line runner adept at hitting creases between the tackles, Ajayi is at his best when attacking holes from the "dot" position (7 to 8 yards deep, directly behind the quarterback). According to the Next Gen Stats, 38 of Ajayi's 48 rushing attempts from a single-back formation have come with Ryan Tannehill positioned under the center. The rugged runner has averaged 7.8 yards per attempt on those runs, a figure that's unheard of in the NFL.

Part of Ajayi's success from single-back formations can be attributed to the alignment providing him with the opportunity to hit the hole with his shoulders square to the line. As a natural downhill runner, he is able to attack defenders with maximum power and explosiveness upon contact. Given his size and aforementioned strength, Ajayi is able to run through tackles and consistently finish his runs falling forward.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000733644/article/jay-ajayis-rise-explained-nfl-execs-on-cam-newtons-criticism
 
Long story short, Gase has found an effective counter to the run-stopping tactics defensive coordinators have thrown at Miami's newfound running game. Most importantly, the new head coach has helped the Dolphins establish an offensive identity that could carry them into the postseason

Actually Ajayi had to sit down with Gase and tell him how to use him and it's yet to be seen through only two games if defenses can counter the rush attack. Fact remains if they remain simple and effective, there are really no answers for well-executed plays and a solid o-line.
 
The first thing you need to know is that 3 yards for every yard made is a low ratio.

Ok...what the hell does that mean...I'm pretty sure he's getting 3 yards for every 3 yards gained?

If you mean avg per carry?....he's getting over 6 yards a carry I think.
 
Ok...what the hell does that mean...I'm pretty sure he's getting 3 yards for every 3 yards gained?

If you mean avg per carry?....he's getting over 6 yards a carry I think.

lol I thought I read it wrong. Idk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Ok...what the hell does that mean...I'm pretty sure he's getting 3 yards for every 3 yards gained?

If you mean avg per carry?....he's getting over 6 yards a carry I think.

Meaning he isn't dancing in the backfield I.e running a sweep for a 1 yard gain.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The first thing you need to know is that 3 yards for every yard made is a low ratio.

This is what I meant when I said he was a North-South runner with a little wiggle.

"He was a straight-line runner with size and speed," said an NFC scout who scouted Ajayi at Boise State. "I didn't expect him to light up the league like this, but he did have feet and hips. ... I thought he would be a one-cut slasher with the potential to be a solid starter."

As a straight-line runner adept at hitting creases between the tackles, Ajayi is at his best when attacking holes from the "dot" position (7 to 8 yards deep, directly behind the quarterback). According to the Next Gen Stats, 38 of Ajayi's 48 rushing attempts from a single-back formation have come with Ryan Tannehill positioned under the center. The rugged runner has averaged 7.8 yards per attempt on those runs, a figure that's unheard of in the NFL.

Part of Ajayi's success from single-back formations can be attributed to the alignment providing him with the opportunity to hit the hole with his shoulders square to the line. As a natural downhill runner, he is able to attack defenders with maximum power and explosiveness upon contact. Given his size and aforementioned strength, Ajayi is able to run through tackles and consistently finish his runs falling forward.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000733644/article/jay-ajayis-rise-explained-nfl-execs-on-cam-newtons-criticism

Ajayi's burst has been underrated. Many viewed him as an average talent. If you couldn't see it on the field at Boise, the 1.59 10-YS and 39" vert should have made you look twice.
 
Ok...what the hell does that mean...I'm pretty sure he's getting 3 yards for every 3 yards gained?

If you mean avg per carry?....he's getting over 6 yards a carry I think.

I wondered the same but could only surmise that the number represents the total number of yards traveled to affect a positive net yard - to include yards before the line of scrimmage and any yards trekked laterally and in reverse. Of course, that's my guess...perhaps someone will clear it up. I would guess a similar low number for Larry Czonka and comparatively high number for Barry Sanders.
 
I wondered the same but could only surmise that the number represents the total number of yards traveled to affect a positive net yard - to include yards before the line of scrimmage and any yards trekked laterally and in reverse. Of course, that's my guess...perhaps someone will clear it up.

It means he's not dancing around. They are measuring total distance run vs yards gained.
 
It means he's not dancing around. They are measuring total distance run vs yards gained.

So is it a negative critique or not? The way it's worded, makes it seem like it is a bad thing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
So is it a negative critique or not? The way it's worded, makes it seem like it is a bad thing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's good. In addition to not wasting steps, you have to produce a very good YPC to achieve that ratio. But, it drives home the point that he's not running East and West, dancing around behind the line.
 
As mentioned in the article, I like that he usually goes down falling forward. It's not as sexy as B2B 200 yard games, but, in a game of inches, falling forward and getting an extra yard can win games.
 
So is it a negative critique or not? The way it's worded, makes it seem like it is a bad thing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


How does the wording make it seem like a bad thing? C'mon think about it.
 
Actually Ajayi had to sit down with Gase and tell him how to use him and it's yet to be seen through only two games if defenses can counter the rush attack. Fact remains if they remain simple and effective, there are really no answers for well-executed plays and a solid o-line.

It absolutely remains to be seen if the effective rushing attack is sustainable (and half the totals of the last 2 weeks would still be pretty effective!), but this actually really earns by respect and hope for Gase. It's great to be the smartest guy in the room, but it can be even better if a smart guy will listen and implement ideas from others.
 
Back
Top Bottom