NaboCane said:"Shocked and offended" is your description, and quite the exaggeration I might add. If you defend the mindset that asks who's going to replace a person when the subject at hand is the nature and severity of that person's injury, then surely you must see your way clear to a little more tolerance of a viewpoint that asks that we stick to the subject and let talk of a replacement happen another day.
And luckily - for James first and foremost - that the news is somewhat good. If the worst or anything close had happened instead, you might be singing a different tune right now while you backpedaled furiously.
PRECISELY. :clap: