Jerome Baker and Elandon Roberts | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Jerome Baker and Elandon Roberts

Marino2.0

Club Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2017
Messages
4,210
Reaction score
12,751
Jerome Baker is playing 92% of snaps on the season, and played 61% yesterday. Elandon Roberts is playing 62% of snaps on the season, and played 77% yesterday.

In nine games, they have combined for 0 forced fumbles, 0 fumbles recovered, 0 interceptions, 2 passes defensed, 6 tackles for loss, and 3 sacks. Yesterday, they combined for 0s across all of those categories.

It is obvious that our linebackers are a problem. Jerome Baker is not a good football player, and Elandon Roberts is worse. To me, the simplest solution would be to only play 1 inside linebacker.

So here’s my question: why not play 5-1-5 full time? Sieler, Wilkins, Ogbah, Chubb, Phillips, Ingram, and AVG are all good to very good football players. Add in Raekwon, and that’s a rock solid 8-man rotation for a 5-man front.

At the one linebacker spot, we could divide snaps among the pu pu platter of Jerome Baker, Elandon Roberts, Duke Riley, and Tindall fairly evenly so that they’re always fresh and matched to the appropriate down-and-distance for their skill set. 1st, 2nd, or 3rd and long? Baker or Riley. 3rd or 4th and short? Roberts. And Tindall sprinkled in for development. This isn’t going to make any of them great players, but at least it would limit our exposure to their deficiencies.

Then in the secondary, we want X, Kohou, Holland, and Rowe on the field. That’s 4 of 5. We need to settle on a 5th DB. Personally, I thought McKinley looked best of the bunch. But if the staff thinks it’s Crossen or Iggy, whatever. That’s the 5.

Putting aside other issues with our defense, would this not be the path to getting our best football players on the field?
 
I’ve been blasting Baker since last year; and I’m an Ohio State homer who loves his former Buckeyes. Been done with 55 for awhile.

Been really bothered by all the Baker defenders this year who couldn’t accept the fact that he blows. Really infuriating to have “Dolphins” fans explaining to me why I’m wrong on this take.

Roberts was a JAG to begin with so I never got to bothered by him. He is/was a mercenary.
 
We have an abundance of edge players, would be nice to get those guys in more, so the 5-1-5 does sound intriguing.


Would be nice to be able to acquire a good LB next year, but that's another story.
 
I’ve been blasting Baker since last year; and I’m an Ohio State fan.

Been really bothered by all the Baker defenders this year who couldn’t accept the fact that he blows. Really infuriating to have “Dolphins” fans explaining to me why I’m wrong on this take.

Roberts was a JAG to begin with so I never got to bothered by him. He is/was a mercenary.
I have always defended Baker because the numbers were pretty solid when compared to comparable LB’ers. He was doing what he was supposed to do so he wasn’t posting crazy stats. I was good with that.

So I looked at the numbers to see where he’s going wrong and it is pretty obvious that we changed up the defense. Which makes no sense. Because the whole point of keeping Boyer was continuity. But we aren’t blitzing Baker half as much as usual and I think we are playing a lot more Zone, Man/Zone schemes.

Which I get. The Colts have had a lot of success playing that way against the Bills and Chiefs. But that’s not what Boyer had this team doing well in the past. We actually did that poorly last year.

Am I wrong? I’m not wrong about blitzing. I know the numbers. But does anyone who actually knows, know what we have been doing differently besides that?
 
In nine games, they have combined for 0 forced fumbles, 0 fumbles recovered, 0 interceptions, 2 passes defensed, 6 tackles for loss, and 3 sacks. Yesterday, they combined for 0s across all of those categories.
In all fairness, none of those stats have anything to do with the role they are asked to play in this current defense.

Having said that, what they ARE being asked to do (plug the middle of the field), they didn't do very well at all yesterday. They took turns spying on Fields, and they both had their lunch money stolen.
 
Hoping Tindall can develop into something nice, but even with that, need to overhaul the ILB corp. Our pass rushers seemed to get decent pressure on the outside, but Fields was able to just run up the middle all day.
 
Campanile and his assistant need to do a lot, I mean a LOT in practice, about spying and just coverage better. Yes helps with Brissett upcoming don't have to worry so much about the QB running that much, but rest of the teams we face will have more mobile QB's.
 
I have always defended Baker because the numbers were pretty solid when compared to comparable LB’ers. He was doing what he was supposed to do so he wasn’t posting crazy stats. I was good with that.

So I looked at the numbers to see where he’s going wrong and it is pretty obvious that we changed up the defense. Which makes no sense. Because the whole point of keeping Boyer was continuity. But we aren’t blitzing Baker half as much as usual and I think we are playing a lot more Zone, Man/Zone schemes.

Which I get. The Colts have had a lot of success playing that way against the Bills and Chiefs. But that’s not what Boyer had this team doing well in the past. We actually did that poorly last year.

Am I wrong? I’m not wrong about blitzing. I know the numbers. But does anyone who actually knows, know what we have been doing differently besides that?

Your wrong only because you looked at stats to tell you what your eye balls should’ve made clear as day.

He’s bad. He has no instincts whatsoever. He can run straight really fast.

On a better team he would’ve been exposed sooner and never gotten that extension.

When we signed him, we actually NEEDED to spend money as required by the NFL. Just like New England did two off seasons ago. Didn’t matter who they signed but they had to spend the money. Similar situation with Baker I believe. He was very fortunate to be a FA when he was.
 
I absolutely think we should use our second rounder on an ILB next year.

Ivan Pace Jr from Cincinnati.

Right now he’s projected in that area but I suspect he will only continue to rise. Especially if he makes the off season awards rounds, which he should be in the mix for a lot of awards.
 
Baker is also the reason Bradley Chubb is wearing No.2.

Don’t go buying any Chubb jerseys until next year when he switches back to 55.

Are the Dolphins selling No.2 Chubb jerseys? Don’t buy one folks.
I very much hope you’re right, but I highly doubt we cut Baker. We just restructured him, which likely pushes more guaranteed money into the future. And nobody is trading for him.

We just need to draft over him and hope Tindall can also take one of the starting LB jobs next year.
 
Back
Top Bottom