Why aren't more fingers being pointed in accusation at Turner?????
Following up on my earlier post in this emotional thread that is at risk of spiralling out of control, regardless of whether you believe a)it's a far cry from bullying or is the epitome of it, b)if Martin is not sufficiently strong or macho, he's inviting the abuse or under no circumstances should he put with this, and/or he's got personal issues maybe even sexual that in a football context shouldn't be rationalized or excused considering the game he's getting a lot to play or since we don't know the extenuating circumstances there's an inappropriate rush to judgment of him as a quitter.. (did I get them all?)
in any of those cases, IMO it's undeniable that this unwanted attention and potentially large distractor is detrimental to the team. If you agree with this supposition, no matter what side you come out on, fingers have to be pointed at Jim Turner, the OL coach who presumably spends long days with this guy. Either through his drill sergeant macho persona, he's either intentionally encouraged the toughening up of Martin or enabled it. Ain't no way he was oblivous to the problems. So I hold him responsible for any resulting issues. Couple that accountability with that although seemingly accomplished as an OL coach at several NCAA programs, this is his first NFL gig brought along by Sherman, just like he did his worthless son in law to coach Tannehill. It's true that while collegiatte experience can portend professional experience, it's not necessarily a corollary (no matter what BS standard deviation error you choose to slap on it!). Sooooooo...
..being either overtly or covertly responsible for simmering what now is a mess on his "micro" watch, may have created an exclusionary tough guy climate, and can likely turn into much worse, coupled with the fact that no matter how entertaining his hard-nosed act was on HK, he has not produced, so IMO he seems pretty worthless and has got to go sooner than later!