Joey Ranks 1st in

[Silentobserver]

least sacks per game. He's da man, daaaaammmmmm he's good

 

[Mainge]

least sacks per game. He's da man, daaaaammmmmm he's good

Hey, so does Ronnie Brown. But I cringe when I watch him throw, kinda like all of our QB's in the last six years. :wink:

 

[BillyBean]

least sacks per game. He's da man, daaaaammmmmm he's good

It's because he has no sack. If he did, he'd stick around to let a play or two develop...

 

[Silentobserver]

Billy Billy Billy, go back to your hole please.

 

[Dolfan984]

Harrington has always been one of the least sacked QBs his entire career. Nothing has changed.

 

[PhinHood]

It may have something to do with the reshuffled line as well.

 

[rob19]

1 star :wink:

 

[EBMisfit]

It's because he has no sack. If he did, he'd stick around to let a play or two develop...

Just like I'm sure you would if you were playing behind behind such a makeshift OL.:rolleyes2

 

[EBMisfit]

least sacks per game. He's da man, daaaaammmmmm he's good

I'd rather see him rank first in something a bit more useful... like best TD:INT ratio, but I guess we gotta take what we can.

 

[Fresh]

Yeah, also.. a 64.6 QBR with 9 INT's in 4 games.

He's a good backup, nothing more. :rolleyes2

 

[Silentobserver]

5 of those INT's as you well know were tipped balls that hit recievers in the hands, come on, you seen them the same as I did. Why do you keep bringing them up? Are you a hater? I think so and you have man love for Culpepper who loses even with a huge offensive outputs.

 

[Mainge]

5 of those INT's as you well know were tipped balls that hit recievers in the hands, come on, you seen them the same as I did. Why do you keep bringing them up? Are you a hater? I think so and you have man love for Culpepper who loses even with a huge offensive outputs.

Dan Marino lost with huge offensive outputs. Does Marino suck too?

 

[Breed]

Yeah, also.. a 64.6 QBR with 9 INT's in 4 games.

He's a good backup, nothing more. :rolleyes2

I wouldn't even consider him a good backup.......

 

[Dolfan984]

5 of those INT's as you well know were tipped balls that hit recievers in the hands, come on, you seen them the same as I did. Why do you keep bringing them up? Are you a hater? I think so and you have man love for Culpepper who loses even with a huge offensive outputs.

5 ints? 4 is the max you could say IMO. 2-3 is more realistic. Take away the TD Chamber stole away from the Bears DB if you're going to take away INTs.

 

[FinfanDuda]

You forgot to mention Cleo...he hasn't been sacked yet either. I guess I have to give Scarrington atleast a little bit of credit for the Chicago game. Out of both QBs that played, I would definately pick Scarrington over Goofman any day! That is not saying a whole lot though. Goofman does not have prime stats this season either, and take away his great blocking that they had all season, like we did, and Goofman would have about 35 Ints at this point.