Just got finished watching the......... | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Just got finished watching the.........

J

joeharley666

☠️ Banned ☠️
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
2,094
Reaction score
8
game again just now.

I don't know, and I know this isn't going to be popular here, but, I think I keep going with THill the rest of the way.

his throws were pretty good, he just wasn't comfortable in the pocket in this game. We all know he doesn't have pocket presence but he looked really uncomfortable there. I'm really starting to believe it's growing pains with a brand new offense and he's been under Sherman too long. He really looks like he's trying to learn a lot all at once.

Again, he could be a bust but I think we really need to let this play out to be sure. What if by the fifth or sixth game things start clicking and they all grow in this offense. Would hate to see us take this kid at #8 and don't give him at least 2 1/2 seasons and he excels somewhere else.
 
Great a no thanks. Another guy who thinks M Moore is gonna win a playoff game.
 
Maybe but wasn't this offense supposed to be "paint by numbers" for QB's? I mean that's why folks think Nick Foles is doing so good in it,

---------- Post added at 09:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:13 PM ----------
joeharley666 said:
Great a no thanks. Another guy who thinks M Moore is gonna win a playoff game.
Click to expand...

People really let that thumbs up/thumbs down stuff bother them??? Really?
 
I said yesterday lazor O is not happening and ryan not feeling it. other than the good running game, it seems Lazor see's something work and says, yep, wont use that again.
 
I guess my reasoning is that I've calmed down since yesterday finally and I just realize M Moore is taking us nowhere so why bother at this point. Gotta give Ryan at least two more games if not 6
 
I keep hoping for RT to have a Drew Brees type metamorphosis, but thus far, not happening.
 
I don't think we should bail on Tannehill, I still think he can be part of Miami's future. I don't know why people think we can't sit him awhile and when he is ready, if there is a time, move him back in. It's not new for a QB to get demoted, spend time on the bench, and go on to start again.
 
DolfanISS said:
Maybe but wasn't this offense supposed to be "paint by numbers" for QB's? I mean that's why folks think Nick Foles is doing so good in it,

---------- Post added at 09:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:13 PM ----------



People really let that thumbs up/thumbs down stuff bother them??? Really?
Click to expand...

Not at all. But I just posted and I swear not two seconds later there was already notification. It was like he didn't even read it, just saw thill should start and then responded with a negative right away. Think about it, we have nothing in Moore so why make that change this early? Doesn't make sense. It's not like we have some third stringer who we drafted high sitting on the bench waiting for his shot.
 
Theres a good chance Tannehill will not be the QB we were all hoping for. But Moore is NOT the answer! As pissed off as I am at Tannehill now, I still think he's the best QB on this team. And that may not be saying much!
 
it doesn't help we lead the league in drops, plus the TD retard Wallace walked right out f the end zone.
 
Tannehill looked like crap in the preseason too. The only time the offense came to life was when Matt Moore was running the team.
We are averaging 5.2 yards per carry rushing the ball. Matt Moore could be very effective with that type of running game and play action.
He has a quicker release and better deep touch than RT17.
I say give Matt Moore a shot. Tannehill has done nothing, even with this running game.
Procrastinating, will just cause us to miss the playoffs.
 
jlfin said:
I keep hoping for RT to have a Drew Brees type metamorphosis, but thus far, not happening.
Click to expand...

It even took Drew Brees more than two years and three games for that. Aaron Rodgers didn't start until his forth year. Kurt Warner didn't Start in the NFL till his 6th pro year, Warren Moon his 7th pro year.Steve Youngs first two years his ratings were lower than Tannehills and he didn't become the "starter" in San Francisco till his 4th pro year.

Matter of fact I was looking this over and the top ten rated QB's (by passer rating) of all time are.

(1) Aaron Rodgers (started 4th season)
(2) Peyton Manning (People who expect to use Manning as a standard are high)
(3) Steve Young (4th season-see above)
(4) Philip Rivers (started his 3rd year-Very up and down, surprised he was here)
(5) Tony Romo (Started 6 games his first season)
(6) Tom Brady (Started his second year-very good talent around him)
(7) Drew Brees (Started his 2nd year, played pretty poor on very good team-see above)
(8) Kurt Warner (see above)
(9) Ben Roethlisberger (1st year starter-very good talent around him)
(10) Joe Montana (became starter his 3rd year)

So, although I think it's a good thing to pull Tannehill I think people who feel "giving up on him" is the thing to do have little knowledge of the "realistic" time it can take a QB to develop.
 
I am not sure why so many people want Moore to start. Moore isn't taking us to a Super Bowl. If Tannehill is as bad as most people on this board think, let him finish the season. Everyone would then know he sucks and the Dolphins will have a high draft pick for a QB (which I don't see a good first round prospect) and Philbin will be gone. If the light comes on midway through, isn't that a good thing? Many think that won't happen, but I say sink or swim with Tannehill. I am still a supporter, and hope he finds "it", but I think they need to ride the season out with him.
 
Njphinsfan said:
I am not sure why so many people want Moore to start. Moore isn't taking us to a Super Bowl. If Tannehill is as bad as most people on this board think, let him finish the season. Everyone would then know he sucks and the Dolphins will have a high draft pick for a QB (which I don't see a good first round prospect) and Philbin will be gone. If the light comes on midway through, isn't that a good thing? Many think that won't happen, but I say sink or swim with Tannehill. I am still a supporter, and hope he finds "it", but I think they need to ride the season out with him.
Click to expand...

Honestly I like Moore too. I don't know why so many fans draw a line and feel they need to pick either Moore or Tannehill. I still think Tannehill is the future BUT I think pulling him for a Moore right now is the best thing to do. Moore has been in more pro systems and it would make sense he should pick it up faster, let him play.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom