I think he has the numbers to do it but they might come with a few *'s. His best seasons came when he batted after Barry Bonds in the lineup and everyone was scared to pitch to Bonds. Kent got to see a ton of good pitches. Also, I hate to say it, but I'm wary of a lot of guys HR numbers in that era. And considering who else was in that locker room, who knows if he was juicing or not.
If I had to vote I would lean toward no. When I think of Jeff Kent I don't think of him as one of the greatest players of all time, which might have more to do with me not giving him enough credit then any fault of his. One thing that may hurt him is that I don't think he was very popular with the media guys. They hold a grudge sometimes when it comes to HOF voting.