KFFL- Boston and Traylor | Page 3 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

KFFL- Boston and Traylor

Has David Boston not already displayed himself?


There's good..there's bad....He can't stay healthy.

1 mil would be the max hit I'd take on the guy......I mean, max.
 
GoonBoss said:
Has David Boston not already displayed himself?


There's good..there's bad....He can't stay healthy.

1 mil would be the max hit I'd take on the guy......I mean, max.
Click to expand...

The good was pretty much one season with the Cardinals a few years back which is starting to look like a career year.
 
kingnate85 said:
The good was pretty much one season with the Cardinals a few years back which is starting to look like a career year.
Click to expand...

Well, even with San Diego he still put up very similar #'s to Chambers. Right around 8td's with 800 yards receivig.

So if you say that one season in Arizona was the only good then you must thinkChambers is horrible.

Boston has had 2 seasons over 1000 yards receiving. Chambers has had zero. Boston had no running game or a true QB either.

Bostons worse season in 2003 as a full year starter he still had 880 yards, 7 TD'S and 70 catches.

Not one season has Chambers caught 70+ passes.

Bostons worst season for a full year all his numbers in his worse year are still better then Chambers career average.

TD'S Chambers averages less then 7 plus he averages less then 880 yards a season.

Boston had Plummer and Drew BREES when he was horrible.

You still don't want Boston? If you think he is barely good enough to be a #3 then Chambers should be a #4 by your logic.
 
GRYPHONK said:
Well, even with San Diego he still put up very similar #'s to Chambers. Right around 8td's with 800 yards receivig.

So if you say that one season in Arizona was the only good then you must thinkChambers is horrible.

Boston has had 2 seasons over 1000 yards receiving. Chambers has had zero. Boston had no running game or a true QB either.

Bostons worse season in 2003 as a full year starter he still had 880 yards, 7 TD'S and 70 catches.

Not one season has Chambers caught 70+ passes.

Bostons worst season for a full year all his numbers in his worse year are still better then Chambers career average.

TD'S Chambers averages less then 7 plus he averages less then 880 yards a season.

Boston had Plummer and Drew BREES when he was horrible.

You still don't want Boston? If you think he is barely good enough to be a #3 then Chambers should be a #4 by your logic.
Click to expand...


...plus he is actually younger than Chambers!!! If the man stays healthy he will be an impact player..bottom line,period,end of discussion!!
 
He was going to be last season if he had stayed healthy. I actually want him back. He still produced over a 1000 yards in 00, would have done it easily if he played all of 2003, was easily on track in 02, and well this year he might have gotten close. He is a good WR, scratch that a really good WR when he's at 230, running a 4.35 with good quickness. He's still not that old either. We need to either get Boston+Schulters or Law. Traylor is a given guy we need to sign.
 
Jaj said:
We need to either get Boston+Schulters or Law. Traylor is a given guy we need to sign.
Click to expand...

Boston, Schulters and Traylor would make me an EXTREMELY happy camper.

I'm still really skeptical about Ty Law's foot. Plus all the money he would demand.

Traylor and Schulters would fill needs, and Boston would give us the opportunity to see him like we wanted to last year.

I would rather sign two out of those three guys than sign Ty Law.
 
Schulters+Jones would be a great S combo. We need to stop the run first and foremost that's why Traylor is so important. Boston could bring us an edge in the passing game but he's more of a bonus.
 
outlawd2u said:
Hey........... Nice knowledge of the porn industry man!!! LoL, I didn't even know who they were, but it was some video I had downloaded a few years back, and I just took a still shot of it
Click to expand...
Do you recall the name of the video?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom