ThunderDan13
Windy City Fin-Fan (ie. Lonely)
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2008
- Messages
- 354
- Reaction score
- 0
While I am a die-hard Dolphins fan, I am more of a casual NFL fan in favor of college football. I don't keep up with the rest of the league as much as some of you and I have a short memory when it comes to the going-ons of the NFL.
So I have a question that's been boiling in my head since Henne did a decent job in training camp.
Aren't most (or at least a good number) of great/legendary QBs thrust into the game too early? Don't they quickly get their act together in a season or two and then grow to shine?
If I remember correctly Marino got the start half-way through his rookie season, posted a record passer rating for a rookie, and then went on to be the greatest quarterback in the history of the game. Big Ben, whiile maybe not HoF (yet) is definitely an exciting and competitive QB, he started like his 3rd game or something and had an amazing season. Montana started his second season. Elway took a team to the playoffs his rookie season.
Here is my question: Is trial by fire really as bad as some of you make it sound?? I keep hearing "if he's not ready, he'll be horrible and we'll screw him like we did Beck!" But... maybe Beck just wasn't good enough? Maybe this should be the test for a good quaterback.... throw them to the wolves, if they come back with a wolf-hide football then we have a winner.. if he doesn't then at least we know.
I understand what some of your are saying about bringing a QB up..... but you have to at least admit that this also isn't a full-proof plan and many "brought up" QBs NEVER prosper in the league.
Even if the success rate for bringing up a quarterback rather than trial by fire is a little better..... isn't it worth knowing sooner?
I really haven't made up my mind yet, but I'm starting to fall into the camp that believes that this "bringing up a QB" talk is more talk than truth. This thread is not to talk about whether Henne/Penne should start, but about QB philosophy. I think throwing them to the wolves, might be the better way to find greatness.
So I have a question that's been boiling in my head since Henne did a decent job in training camp.
Aren't most (or at least a good number) of great/legendary QBs thrust into the game too early? Don't they quickly get their act together in a season or two and then grow to shine?
If I remember correctly Marino got the start half-way through his rookie season, posted a record passer rating for a rookie, and then went on to be the greatest quarterback in the history of the game. Big Ben, whiile maybe not HoF (yet) is definitely an exciting and competitive QB, he started like his 3rd game or something and had an amazing season. Montana started his second season. Elway took a team to the playoffs his rookie season.
Here is my question: Is trial by fire really as bad as some of you make it sound?? I keep hearing "if he's not ready, he'll be horrible and we'll screw him like we did Beck!" But... maybe Beck just wasn't good enough? Maybe this should be the test for a good quaterback.... throw them to the wolves, if they come back with a wolf-hide football then we have a winner.. if he doesn't then at least we know.
I understand what some of your are saying about bringing a QB up..... but you have to at least admit that this also isn't a full-proof plan and many "brought up" QBs NEVER prosper in the league.
Even if the success rate for bringing up a quarterback rather than trial by fire is a little better..... isn't it worth knowing sooner?
I really haven't made up my mind yet, but I'm starting to fall into the camp that believes that this "bringing up a QB" talk is more talk than truth. This thread is not to talk about whether Henne/Penne should start, but about QB philosophy. I think throwing them to the wolves, might be the better way to find greatness.