phinfan2003 said:Is crack on that list because I didn't see it?
phinfan2003 said:Is crack on that list because I didn't see it?
If the NFL didn't mind if it was used in the off-season, wouldn't they have stipulated as much when they created the policy?adamprez2003 said:If it's something as stupid as ephedrine, then this has to be overturned. It's one thing to ban these substances prior to a game because they can be considered game enhancing, it's another to ban them during the offseason
Well they're probably not perfect when they do these things. There is always the element of reasonableness built into any agreement.jspchief said:If the NFL didn't mind if it was used in the off-season, wouldn't they have stipulated as much when they created the policy?
I would think that they are very aware and deliberate in the writing of these policies. I don't think pseudoephedrine got on there on accident.dolphinzen said:Well they're probably not perfect when they do these things. There is always the element of reasonableness built into any agreement.
Your not going to ban a man from making an NFL living for using Sudafed because he has a cold.
Almost as absurd as him taking some substance to lose weight, when he knew he was on a strict drug program.adamprez2003 said:I think he was using something to lose weight or clean out his system. It would be absurd if he's banned for a year for that
phinfan2003 said:Is crack on that list because I didn't see it?