List Of CBs Waddle Will Face With Hill Drawing #1 CB
- Thread starter Fin-Loco
- Start date
Waddle's going to absolutely feast this year.
oh good lord
good luck to those guys lol
good luck to those guys lol
GhostArmOfMarino
☠️ Banned ☠️
I doubt we will be seeing too much man coverage, so Im not sure Waddle will be facing these guys 1v1 as much as we would like.
Using zone against Hill, Waddle, Gesicki, and Wilson? Not to mention some pretty good receiving RBs w/ speed out of the backfield.
GhostArmOfMarino
☠️ Banned ☠️
Man is even worse IMO.
Yes, a zone has soft spots but man is meant to be played when your corner talent can match the WR talent OR if you have very good safety play.
Zone would result in more completions quite possibly but a much lower chance of allowing a massive play.
There's no way on Earth I'm trusting my coverage guys enough to man up across the board, it's asking for big plays.
I'd also say Tua hasn't shown good pre snap recognition and zone is more likely to throw him off than easy man reads .
Yup. I'm taking Duper / Clayton numbers and playmaking.... Hill, Waddle, and Gesicki... Wow! And Ced Wilson may be dynamic as well.
Can you imagine our formations with Ingold and a tailback in with Gesicki, Hill, and Waddle benefitting from the play action stuff off of our Wide Zone scheme? CRAZY!
ANUFan
Club Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2010
- Messages
- 27,965
- Reaction score
- 37,444
I've very curious how teams defended KC that previous 2 years. I think that really tells you what to expect defensive-wise against Miami.
Expect LOTS of 2 high and quarters!
The real "potential" winners are going to be your 3 reciever in Wilson and your TE in Gesicki exploting the honey spot and those seams.
we have the weapons......now we need the OL do do it's job and for Tua to be the Tua that he was at bama
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2010
- Messages
- 2,516
- Reaction score
- 2,246
If we can get hill, waddle and gesicki clicking then we're gonna see a mix of mixed coverages with a 3 man rush like the bengals played against kc in the pos and cover 0 style blitzes basically because we made them popular. defenses are going to try and play two on top AND double team hill at the same time, lol. if we can make teams that man-blitz on their way to stopping the run pay then our ol will start seeing lots of 3 man rushes with soft zones which should really help our ol and our running game.
My point is either one will bring much depression to the D-Coordinators.
With man coverage, you at least make it tougher for the top receiver, while being able to also maybe get the 2nd receiver to work harder for his yards.
In zone you pick your poison where, and by who you want to be beaten by.
Zone comprises of far more discipline, more alertness, and is much easier to be beaten, to have defenders confused who had who and lose coverage.
I do agree with you that if you get a defense that is capable of playing zone well, with the right players it's better (Not much with Miami's speed, but for many teams, zone might put them in an even bigger disadvantage.
ANUFan
Club Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2010
- Messages
- 27,965
- Reaction score
- 37,444
This is where you really need an accurate QB to exploit those soft belly’s. Getting the ball up over LBs and between safeties and those quick
Closing areas.
Last edited:
Folks gonna be afraid , very very afraid
Gsmack_42
Club Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2009
- Messages
- 5,571
- Reaction score
- 11,186
2 great receivers and all that speed in the back field. They better be on their toes. Great off-season haul by the Fins.