London vs Turner? Who would you want to excel?

[Travis34]

So, it seems like these two could be similar players. Tall endzone targets. I know London has decent speed but what about Turner? I feel like a mix of speed and size are a dominating combination because size doesn't always work (Wilford)

So any info on him?

Personally, I would much prefer London to be our next "#1" receiver. I'm using that term lightly, but I assume most of you know what I mean. In those youtube videos of him practicing he made both Allens and atleast Bell look ridiculous on many occasions. I have high hopes for him.


Don't get me wrong though, it would be amazing if both turned out well.

 

[athrun340]

Brandon London!! I love his energy and passion for the game.

 

[vere76]

Both

 

[Travis34]

Brandon London!! I love his energy and passion for the game.

Oh yeah, I forgot to add that. London has got to be one of the most hungry players on the team.

 

[clownfish]

Turner. I'm a USC alum and have wanted a Trojan on da Phins for years. Finally!!!!!!!!!! You guys won't be disappointed.

 

[Gilo45]

Love London's enthusiasm

Love Turner's potential.

I think Turner could turn out better. Althought I'd prefer it to be London maybe?

I'll go with Turner, cause at 3rd round I'd like it to be justified, and to shut a few doubters up on here...

 

[MarinoEqualsGod]

Oh yeah, I forgot to add that. London has got to be one of the most hungry players on the team.

London is our best special teams player, but Turner will be a starting receiver in this league. I just don't get that sense about London. Our special teams is shaping up to be one of the NFL's best with London and Hartline.

 

[CitizenSnips]

the guy we drafted, obviously. I mean we invested in turner, not london.

 

[Rich22]

Why one or the other? Why not both - 2 big targets!

 

[esafille]

Both... The Chargers have both Vincent Jackson and Malcolm Floyd, and they're similar as well