Sal Lisitano
Perennial All-Pro
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2003
- Messages
- 2,371
- Reaction score
- 2
- Age
- 48
I was excited to see M. Roth get a sack yesterday!!! Was that his first of the season? I think it was!!!
Go Fins!!!
Go Fins!!!
Sal Lisitano said:I was excited to see M. Roth get a sack yesterday!!! Was that his first of the season? I think it was!!!
Go Fins!!!
Don't forget he also had a fumble recovery. :wink:Sal Lisitano said:I was excited to see M. Roth get a sack yesterday!!! Was that his first of the season? I think it was!!!
Go Fins!!!
Nublar7 said:Don't forget he also had a fumble recovery. :wink:
Sal Lisitano said:I was excited to see M. Roth get a sack yesterday!!! Was that his first of the season? I think it was!!!
Go Fins!!!
apa64che said:I hate to say "I told you so" when it comes to Roth, but some poster last week was dumpin on him. Like i said before... guys, give Roth some time. He still has a way to go, but he's got heart, and the talent to be really good.
Sal Lisitano said:Our secondary gives up way too many big plays.
Go Fins!!!
islandah said:Don't know what you're talking about. The Bollinger to Jolley deep bomb is the NFL's most unstoppable and feared play!
apa64che said:I hate to say "I told you so" when it comes to Roth, but some poster last week was dumpin on him. Like i said before... guys, give Roth some time. He still has a way to go, but he's got heart, and the talent to be really good.
Funny how everyone, myself included, has been saying our d-line is an area of weakness. If Roth, Wright and Vickerson actually develop as hyped, we could have a very young dominant line for years to come, even post-JT someday.
ckparrothead said:I wonder why you and other people have been down on our DL. Our team is overall set to have a franchise-record 50 sacks this season. We get pressure. No, it's not all the DL doing it, but even when other positions get the sack on a blitz, it is because the DL is doing their job drawing the attention.
ckparrothead said:One sack is hardly cause for "I told you so" I mean he could have just gotten lucky. I've never really been down on Roth at all, I'm just saying. There was no reason to have a knee-jerk reaction because he didn't have a sack through 12 games, and there is far less reason for knee-jerk reaction just because he got a sack in this game.
I wonder why you and other people have been down on our DL. Our team is overall set to have a franchise-record 50 sacks this season. We get pressure. No, it's not all the DL doing it, but even when other positions get the sack on a blitz, it is because the DL is doing their job drawing the attention.