http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/11/20/colts-will-have-a-hard-time-trading-manning/
Confirms what John Clayton said last week. Many on this site disagreed with my post/agreeing with Clayton. Now another prominent insider says he could be cut loose.
Perhaps winning these games now makes us look like a legit team for Manning to join in order to put us over the top. Just a thought.
If hes healthy..which is the question..no doubt he is top three. Plus I would bet Reggie Wayne would want to follow Manning...and I bet he would even take a pay cut to play with him again. Even without Wayne...Manning would have plenty of weapons here to play withPeyton...is still a top 3 qb.with Peyton we are guaranteed at least the afc championship.with that defense and a elite qb? I...think I would cry if this happens
enough with drafting OL in the first!
It'd be fine if we had a quarterback back there. If we signed Manning than we'd definately need to upgrade the RT spot to ensure he makes it through a whole season.
This is Peyton Manning we're talking about here. I'd say it would be a no brainer to try and bring him in if we can.
How does our salary cap situation look for next year though? I bet he'd still want to be paid like a top 5 player in the NFL.
If we get Manning...we should take BPA in the first. Corner..Pass Rusher..OT..whoever it may be. We just need an impact player. But if we did get Manning...we should def go RT in round 2-3 or find a good one in FAI have no problem with upgrading RT (actually I'm all for it) just not with our first round pick.
Injuries and the 28 mill he is due the day the league year startsI said two weeks ago that manning could very well be cut. injuries and age do not strong faith in a player make.
Generally speaking tackles drafted in the first round are almost always "left" tackles. By the way it's looking we'll be drafting somewhere in high single digits to the low teens. There is no way you could justify paying a right tackle the kind of money that is associated with picking a player in that range. I think we still need a QB in the first, we need to look to secure the future. Anyone else would just be a stop gap. It's time to take the QB early.
Agree for the most part. Dallas took Tyron Smith early last year to play RT...you know how we love to model ourselves after them haha. But I agree...Im not taking a RT unless hes the clear cut BPA...which is almost never the caseGenerally speaking tackles drafted in the first round are almost always "left" tackles. By the way it's looking we'll be drafting somewhere in high single digits to the low teens. There is no way you could justify paying a right tackle the kind of money that is associated with picking a player in that range. I think we still need a QB in the first, we need to look to secure the future. Anyone else would just be a stop gap. It's time to take the QB early.
Bringing in a 38 year quarterback with a bad neck makes no sense.If you have a chance of getting Manning you do everything in regards to building around him with weapons, oline and guys that take the ball away on D.
Screw the development of a QB from rd 1.
---------- Post added at 08:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:14 PM ----------
A healthy Peyton Manning means you have a chance for a Super Bowl.
Nobody wants an injured Manning. What I do want is to do our due diligence...people thought Brees was done too. If he is healthy..and the Colts decide theyd rather move on with Luck...you better believe Id take a healthy Peyton Manning.I don't understand why some people have this fetish about 3rd string loser qb's (moore) and other teams washed up, injured trash (manning).