Market for Matt Moore Heating Up
- Thread starter FinAtic8480
- Start date
Michael Fei
Practice Squad
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2011
- Messages
- 103
- Reaction score
- 0
I think we should call Andy Reid and ask how he keeps getting 2nd rounders for QBs who either have had limited success (Kolb, Feeley) or are past their prime (McNabb).
Moore fits into the category of the former (obviously), and I would argue that he had more success last year than Kolb and Feeley did in their brief tenures in Philly.
Moore fits into the category of the former (obviously), and I would argue that he had more success last year than Kolb and Feeley did in their brief tenures in Philly.
At most I'd trade him for a player that helps the team. How would gaining a 6th rd pick for next year's draft be beneficial?
Dolphins7213
Scout Team
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2005
- Messages
- 108
- Reaction score
- 0
We gave up a 2nd rounder for Feeley..Moore is just worth a 4th...
LVphinfan
Practice Squad
I agree, trade him for a player the team needs if he has to be traded at all.
DEVLIN sucks. And w/a close-to-noodle arm? He's little better than FIEDLER, if he's better at all.
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2006
- Messages
- 5,192
- Reaction score
- 3,479
You can't compare trades like this. Remember, Roy Williams was traded for a 1st and 3rd, while Santonio Holmes was traded for a 5th.
SabanHater
***** in the House!
Matt Moore is worth so much more to us than anything a 6th round pick would warrant (with the exception of a Tom Brady... of course)
MOORE was the 12th best QB in the NFL last season, whether some baboons don't think so or think otherwise. And he had a totally unready HC and the COLUMBO-CAREY fiasco to deal with! So we know that AT THE VERY LEAST, MOORE was better than 20 of the starting QBs in the NFL. "Back-up"? Ha!! And all this crapola about a 5th or 6th??Absurd...forget THAT!
IF anyone wants MOORE, they better come to our door w/at least a 2nd, and maybe a 2nd and 3rd . Otherwise, forget it. He's more valuable to US. It usually takes a QB 3 years to "arrive" as a QB. GARRARD's a 34 year old QB w/back issues now. Frankly, I'd rather have MOORE, because I don't trust back injuries (remember D GARDENER?) , especially on a 34 year old QB who could be serving as our starting QB until he's 37/close to 38 Years old.
And what if TANNEHILL, whenever he starts, (a) gets hurt; or (b) busts; or (c) needs a little more time? Then what? Remember MIAMI's SB Championship years, especially the perfect season? Thank heavens we had E MORRALL...and SHULA never looked to trade him for a "5th or 6th".
IF anyone wants MOORE, they better come to our door w/at least a 2nd, and maybe a 2nd and 3rd . Otherwise, forget it. He's more valuable to US. It usually takes a QB 3 years to "arrive" as a QB. GARRARD's a 34 year old QB w/back issues now. Frankly, I'd rather have MOORE, because I don't trust back injuries (remember D GARDENER?) , especially on a 34 year old QB who could be serving as our starting QB until he's 37/close to 38 Years old.
And what if TANNEHILL, whenever he starts, (a) gets hurt; or (b) busts; or (c) needs a little more time? Then what? Remember MIAMI's SB Championship years, especially the perfect season? Thank heavens we had E MORRALL...and SHULA never looked to trade him for a "5th or 6th".