RickyWilliams
It's time to turn this ship around.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/custom/business/sfl-flzstadium0214sbfeb14,0,5941161.story
The contract ran into trouble at the city when Commissioner Marc Sarnoff said he thought the team was getting too sweet a deal. He and Commissioner Tomas Regalado opposed the deal, but Sarnoff suggested three new provisions: that the Marlins help cover cost overruns on the parking lots, that they turn over proceeds from naming rights and that if the team is sold within 10 years, any profits would go to the city and the county.
"I just don't think it's taxpayers' job to enhance a man's asset," Sarnoff said. "It's not taxpayers' job to increase the franchise value. And if the franchise value right now is $300 million and it goes up to $600 million, it seems to me the taxpayers should benefit from that franchise increase in the event of a flip."
I have to agree with this. At least there is still a chance they'll be gone.
The contract ran into trouble at the city when Commissioner Marc Sarnoff said he thought the team was getting too sweet a deal. He and Commissioner Tomas Regalado opposed the deal, but Sarnoff suggested three new provisions: that the Marlins help cover cost overruns on the parking lots, that they turn over proceeds from naming rights and that if the team is sold within 10 years, any profits would go to the city and the county.
"I just don't think it's taxpayers' job to enhance a man's asset," Sarnoff said. "It's not taxpayers' job to increase the franchise value. And if the franchise value right now is $300 million and it goes up to $600 million, it seems to me the taxpayers should benefit from that franchise increase in the event of a flip."
I have to agree with this. At least there is still a chance they'll be gone.