Care to explain how it was an "unwarranted cheap-shot"?
He essentially just said the exact same thing Iverson did in the infamous "we talkin' 'bout practice" rant.
Oh... lets count the ways...
a.) Iverson's rant was in response to his HEAD COACH's direct criticism that he didn't practice hard enough. Who, among the Dolphins coaching staff has EVER been quoted saying Matt Moore didn't practice hard enough? Do you have quotes of people questioning Moore's effort? Actually, I've heard Joe Philbin, Mike Sherman, Tony Sparano, and others CONSISTENTLY praise Matt Moore for his hard work and preparation... this year and last. Unlike Iverson... Moore's practice EFFORT has never been questioned, that I'm aware of.
b.) Iverson's rant was just that.... a rant. Multiple statements. On and on and on.... not one line in at end of story where Moore already admitted poor practice PERFORMANCE (not effort), and described how he's been trying to improve it year to year (wow, direct EFFORT to improve... not ridiculing the idea practice is important)... and he actually states that he'd like to think game performance matters MOST. Not that practice isn't important - which is what Iverson's rant does IMO... but that game performance should matter MOST.
For clarity's sake... here's what your calling equivalent:
IVERSON:
“We're sitting here, and I'm supposed to be the franchise player, and we're talking about practice.”
“I mean listen, we're sitting here talking about practice, not a game, not a game, not a game, but we're talking about practice.”
“Not the game that I go out there and die for and play every game like it's my last, but we're talking about practice man.”
“How silly is that?”
“Now I know that I'm supposed to lead by example and all that, but I'm not shoving that aside like it don't mean anything.
“We're talking about practice man.”
"We're talking about practice.”
“We're talking about practice.”
“We're not talking about the game.”
“We're talking about practice.”
“When you come to the arena, and you see me play, you've seen me play right, you've seen me give everything I've got, but we're talking about practice right now.”
“Hey I hear you, it's funny to me too, hey it's strange to me too, but we're talking about practice man, we're not even talking about the game, when it actually matters, we're talking about practice.”
MOORE:
One reason Moore is even with Garrard, or perhaps slightly behind, is because Moore admittedly isn’t the best practice player. He has a career 80.1 passer rating and 13-12 record as a starter with Miami and Carolina, but seems to play better on Sundays than during the week.
“There is a little truth to that,” Moore said. “I’ve been trying to get better year by year in practice, but does it really matter what I do in practice? I’d like to think that what happens in games matters most.”
c.) Calling someone "Iverson-like"... brings in a lot of baggage that isn't, and shouldn't ever, be associated with Moore.
Here's just "some" of that baggage:
During the 1997 offseason, Iverson and his friends were stopped by policemen for speeding late at night and was arrested for carrying a concealed weapon and for possession of marijuana. He pleaded no contest and was sentenced to community service.
On February 24, 2004, Iverson urinated in a trash can at Bally's Atlantic City casino and was told by casino management not to return.
On December 9, 2005 after the Sixers defeated the Charlotte Bobcats, Iverson paid a late-night visit to the Trump Taj Mahal. After winning a hand at a three-card-stud poker table, Iverson was overpaid $10,000 in chips by a dealer. When the dealer quickly realized the mistake and requested the chips back, Iverson refused and a heated head-turning argument between him and casino staff began. Atlantic City casino regulations reportedly state that when a casino makes a payout mistake in favor of the gambler, he or she must return the money that they did not legitimately win by playing.
Also in 2005, Iverson's bodyguard Jason Kane was accused of assaulting a man at a Washington DC nightclub after the man, Marlin Godfrey, refused to leave the club's VIP section so Iverson's entourage could enter. Godfrey suffered a concussion, a ruptured eardrum, a burst blood vessel in his eye, a torn rotator cuff, cuts and bruises, and emotional injuries. Although Iverson did not touch Godfrey himself, Godfrey sued Iverson for the injuries caused by his bodyguard. In 2007 a jury awarded Godfrey $260,000. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the verdict in 2009.
Once after a fight with his wife (she left their house to get away) Iverson used his speed to rack up 14 law offenses as he searched for her with his gun. Although, he was accused of 12 felonies, the testimony in court did not hold up and Iverson was set free.
In a Philadelphia Inquirer column published March 7, 2010, Stephen A. Smith wrote that according to "numerous NBA sources", Iverson would "either drink himself into oblivion or gamble his life away", and that Iverson had already been banned from casinos in Detroit and Atlantic City. Smith also wrote that Tawanna, his wife of eight years, had separated from him and filed for divorce, seeking custody of their five children, as well as child support and alimony payments.
In November 2010, Kate ***an, a 76ers beat writer for the Inquirer reported that Iverson was "broke" and heavily in debt, "by all accounts except his own", and that a member of Iverson's family had previously contacted NBA teams about a contract for him, as he would not be able to pay that person without a contract.
In August 2011, an Ohio man sued Iverson for $2.5 million in damages, claiming he was assaulted by Iverson's security guard in a 2009 bar fight in Detroit. The federal judge dismissed the case, finding no evidence that Iverson or his bodyguard struck the plaintiff, Guy Walker.
To my knowledge... Matt Moore has never even received a speeding ticket.
Now I understand your comparison was in reference just to the comments about practice (which is unfair enough IMO - as I explained above) - relying on the context of the discussion, but when you make the comparison by calling someone "Iverson-like" - you're evoking and inviting all that entails in others minds... or at least expressing ambivalence whether others associate ALL the attributes calling someone "Iverson-like" evokes.
Anyway... Just my opinion. Doesn't count anymore than yours or anyone elses... but I found the comment to be just what I called it: an unwarranted cheap shot. :)
Now that I have your attention (perhaps) though.... I would like at least a yes or no (your time permitting) on the question I posed to you in other threads the last two days.
I believe the threads are here:
http://www.finheaven.com/forums/sho...ing-signed-yet-but-Egnew-and-Vernon-!!!/page4
http://www.finheaven.com/forums/showthread.php?321973-ESPN-s-Dolphins-Camp-Watch/page2
And here is a short synopsis of my question:
Regarding your characterization of other posters repeating an assertion I've read in several mainstream media reports (that Dolphins "cap guru" Dawn Aponte, is insisting on offset language in Ryan Tannehills rookie contract)... you stated that to do so, was "just another way to avoid blaming Jeff Ireland for anything bad."
I asked if (hypothetically) someone tweeted out the complete rank speculation that Joe Philbin was desperate to sign Matt Flynn this off season, BUT that Jeff Ireland had intentionally "sabotaged" the contract talks/offer... as if it were a bald fact... <--- a conspiracy theory directly contradicted by Steve Ross in easily referenced quotes. Would that be the opposite of your characterization? <-- Namely, seeking to assign blame to Jeff Ireland, where's its unclear any exists... and what evidence does exist - directly contradicts assigning that blame?