Maxwell - the Seattle perspective | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Maxwell - the Seattle perspective

Fin Thirteen

Club Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
4,664
Reaction score
1,073
This kind of thing might have been posted when we first traded for him, so sorry if it's a rehash, but I thought I'd see what Seattle fans on fieldgulls.com thought of Maxwell when he left them.

With the Howard signing, it is even more abundantly clear that Maxwell is our #1 WR and across from him is/are going to be one or more raw receivers. He may not get targeted as often given the easier pickings in Lippett/Howard/McCain etc, but he's going to have to lead that CB group towards respectability. Judging from the reaction to his departure, the fans are divided as to whether he is a #1 or #2 CB, though just about all Seattle fans call him a very good press corner:

“Hated how he’d randomly give up on a play though, and then give up a random long completion. Infuriating. Good player overall though.”

“I think Maxwell is a better all purpose CB than Browner was for Seattle”

“He is being paid like a player to build a secondary around. And I just don’t think he is that. I think Sherm, ET, and Kam made Byron look better than he is. I still think he is good, but I would guess that his play gets worse rather than gets better. He also hasn’t developed an ability to stay healthy.”

“Part of the Eagles evaluation may be that Maxwell did pretty well against Dez Bryant. He’s not a bad guy to go against receivers like Dez, because he’s both fast and physical, with long arms and a fearless, aggressive mentality.”

"I think it’s safe to say that at a minimum, Maxwell is a very good NFL corner. Maybe not great or elite"

“To me he seems like he’s worth maybe $8 million (solidly good coverage corner out wide as well as solidly good slot corner too)— so yeah the Eagles probably overpaid a bit; but that’s not uncommon for the free agency route. But Maxwell has been developed by the best ‘secondary’ organization in the NFL, and is fundamentally sound, extremely competitive, and is used to being targeted as the ‘weak link’ in Seattle’s secondary (getting more than his share of #1 WRs, etc). Just consider the difference in the Hawks performance when Lane was available as the slot corner and Maxwell played the wide corner, versus when the Hawks had to move Maxwell to the slot and Simon played the wide corner. Both Cam Newton and Tom Brady abused Simon in the playoffs once Maxwell was moved to the slot. Gong to miss having Maxwell.”

“I think being in Seattle's secondary makes Maxwell look better than Maxwell actually is, with ET shaded to his side. That being said, I still think he is good.”

“In Seattle, he was playing as the second CB, so he was receiving extra attention from opposing QBs and OCs because he was playing opposite Sherman. Without that, his numbers will necessarily shift. Opposing teams will be forced to account for him and shift action away from him whenever practicable. “

“Teams have already shown he can be thrown at without disastrous results, I doubt the OCs are gonna sit there game-planning and say "well, we were successful against Maxwell last year, but ****, now he’s their best corner so we better avoid him at all costs"
“It seems logical that without Richard Sherman on the field with him, he will receive less attention. Even with all of the extra attention (targeted once in every 5.8 coverage snaps), PFF notes that his opposing passer rating was 78.5 and he allowed only one TD in 2014. I don’t have access to PFF’s signature stats right now, but I am willing to bet that puts him in some pretty elite company.”

“Last season, when it became apparent that opposing QBs were going to test Sherman only so much, I started focusing on Maxwell’s game. And to my eyes, I was surprised at how much better the guy was than I had ever thought to consider him. He’s really good at pressing and then sticking with his guy whatever the route. He rarely allows much separation, and fights like hell when the ball is in the air. Sherman gets his hips and eyes around to the ball consistently quicker than Maxwell, and therefore is consistently better at putting himself in position to make a play. But that’s the biggest difference that I saw, and it’s relative because Maxwell wasn’t bad at that either.”

“Because of the Seahawks’ defensive scheme, Maxwell probably has a higher rate of lining up against the opposition’s top WR than other "#2" CBs in the league and performed very well in that role.”

“To me he seemed to struggle against true #1 receivers. The Eagles division has 3 other teams that have one…Bryant, Odell Beckham, and Desean Jackson. I am curious to see how he gets used.One of my friends looked up the advanced stats, and is not impressed and asked my opinion, I said he is a decent corner, probably a lot like Carry Williams, but without all the penalties.”

“It's Maxwell's physicality at the line that they'll miss the most. Keeping guys from even getting started is every bit as effective as great cover skills. And he has those too. I think he’s going to be really tough to replace. My opinion.”
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is in line with my (fan) perspective as well. I don't think Maxwell is the best CB in the league, but I think he's probably a good starter. On the internet, and this website in particular, there seems to be an all or nothing attitude about players. They're either HOF or they are trash and don't belong in the league. Of course 95% of the players in the league are in actuality somewhere in between those two bookends. :)
 
This is in line with my (fan) perspective as well. I don't think Maxwell is the best CB in the league, but I think he's probably a good starter. On the internet, and this website in particular, there seems to be an all or nothing attitude about players. They're either HOF or they are trash and don't belong in the league. Of course 95% of the players in the league are in actuality somewhere in between those two bookends. :)

This may be blasphemous to some, but Maxwell, when playing at Seattle level, is as good as Grimes was LAST YEAR. He may struggle more with small quick guys (not REAL quick, Grimes couldn't cover them either), but will be much better against the alpha-type. If VJ can scheme it right, Maxwell won't be a liability. I see Maxwell as a solid CB, nothing more. But, as you say, that's not BAD, it just means don't put him on an island.
 
I'll take a "solid starter" over last year's CB crop any day of the week. I think Maxwell will do well here, if he and Howard can press and jam WR's and throw them off, our DL should be able to generate enough pass-rush to throw off opponent's passing game.
That's a stark difference to last year, where playing off-man was like a free-gimmie for even the worst QB's Miami played against.
 
We gave a ridiculous amount of short yardage away last season. Sometimes we were giving a cushion that stretched behind the first down marker. Teams like NE will feast on that.

It's the teams with deep ball ability that will cause us concern, esp in the early season. This is not a Maxwell strong suit. Seahawks, Bengals, Steelers and Bills certainly fit in that category in the first 7 games.
 
This is in line with my (fan) perspective as well. I don't think Maxwell is the best CB in the league, but I think he's probably a good starter. On the internet, and this website in particular, there seems to be an all or nothing attitude about players. They're either HOF or they are trash and don't belong in the league. Of course 95% of the players in the league are in actuality somewhere in between those two bookends. :)

I don't think thats an accurate statement at all....he is not shutdown corner(there aren't many)....but he is not trash either..he actually played well after the first couple starts in Philly.

Thats been the prevailing sentiment...there are some who thinks he sucks....the rest have it right I think.

I haven't heard anybody positive extreme.
 
I'm less concerned with Maxwell and Howard than I am with our nickel and dime CBs. We have an extremely young and very raw secondary that we need to develop quickly. If Maxwell plays lights out, it's possible that we are going to still struggle in coverage.
 
I hear what is being said about Max and it seems he is good enough corner but we need those edge rushers to step up. it all works hand in hand.
 
I don't think thats an accurate statement at all....he is not shutdown corner(there aren't many)....but he is not trash either..he actually played well after the first couple starts in Philly.

Thats been the prevailing sentiment...there are some who thinks he sucks....the rest have it right I think.

I haven't heard anybody positive extreme.

I think you and I are saying the same thing. Whether anyone thinks he's a shutdown or not, I don't know, but my point was...just because he's not the best corner in the league, it doesn't mean he's trash.
 
I think you and I are saying the same thing. Whether anyone thinks he's a shutdown or not, I don't know, but my point was...just because he's not the best corner in the league, it doesn't mean he's trash.

And the bigger picture . . . a CB who can cover the alpha receivers - a staple in the AFC-E. And, IMO, I like Maxwell/Howard better than Grimes/Taylor. My concern is the slot CB.
 
Back
Top Bottom