mwestberry
Club Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2012
- Messages
- 4,894
- Reaction score
- 12,304
Funny as hell ... so spot on ...WTF, I mean the O offers little flexibility or adjustment, something to counter opposing D's adjustments. Virtually little up tempo stuff when the going gets rough. We run a bit then stop, throw a bit then stop, screen after screen and get get some of the fastest guys in the league open after the big year. Follow all this up and can't design an O to win ANY big game OR a successful O against a good team. Strange! Am I missing his genious?
So are we all saying the players are just fine ... they execute each play at least "at standards" ...?
If many agree, then it has to be idiotic playcalling with a mix of tardiness.
It is hard to figure (at least in my eyes) why the team flounders at the exact time they should shine.
That may be a bit exaggerated, but when I see teams time and again, win or lose, have success on 3rd and short and even 4th down, it hits home for me.
Maybe McD is as "purposeful" with his tone and speech pattern in the headset as he is on the podium.

If so, wouldn't a number system be faster than actually repeating the play to the QB... or is this already a thing, and I am ignorant on the subject?
Whatever the case, there seems to be a disconnect between the play called (expected result) and the play itself (actual result) too many times for it to be neglected.
