Merged: 128 teams in NCAA men's basketball tournament? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Merged: 128 teams in NCAA men's basketball tournament?

BAMAPHIN 22

FinHeaven Elite
Joined
Jul 30, 2004
Messages
19,666
Reaction score
47
Location
Huntsville, AL
In a perfect world, college basketball coaches would nearly double the size of the 65-team NCAA men's tournament field. Realistically, they'd accept a smaller victory.

Motivated in part by George Mason's remarkable Final Four run last season, coaches will urge the NCAA to expand its most lucrative championship event during the men's and women's basketball committee meetings in Orlando, Fla., this week.

"They'd love to see the tournament double to 128," said Jim Haney, executive director of the National Association of Basketball Coaches. "It's based on several things. First, there are a lot of good teams worthy of making the NCAA field, and second, the size of 64 or 65 has been in place for a number of years."

Potential models range from minor adjustments to major changes.
When Haney met with NCAA officials last month, he proposed the 128-team field in part because postseason bids may help coaches keep their jobs.

At this year's Final Four, though, Syracuse coach Jim Boeheim said he supported expansion on a smaller scale. Boeheim and others suggested adding three to seven teams, a move they claimed would allow as many as four opening-round games to be played in Dayton, Ohio, instead of the one now played between the two lowest-seeded teams in the field.

Some believe such a schedule would create a more realistic tournament environment since first-round sites also play four games on the first day.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/basketball/ncaa/06/25/bc.bkc.ncaatournament.ap/index.html
 
But changes don't appear imminent.

In March, NCAA president Myles Brand said he didn't see much support to expand the field and vice president for men's basketball Greg Shaheen reiterated that point Friday.

"Many, many people believe the size of the championship is just right," Shaheen said. "A lot of people think there's enough recognition of teams that did well and there's a logical and timely conclusion to the season."
Shaheen said this week's discussions, which end Thursday, will mark the first time expansion has been on the agenda in several years. The reason?

After a four-year legal battle with the National Invitation Tournament, the NCAA agreed to buy the tournament for $56.5 million last August.
Expansion also faces additional hurdles.

If the NCAA opted for a 128-team field, the number of first-round sites would double and an extra week of play would likely be added. Plus, Shaheen said the NCAA would have to debate how best to provide maximum television coverage.
http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/sports/colleges/14900622.htm

I think it'd be great to double the size. March Madness is one of my favorite events of the year.
 
I hate the idea. I think the tournament should be a reward for a team having a successful season and to the conference champions not something that average teams get into because the field is expanded. People like to see a cinderella team go far in the tournament but I also like seeing the best teams play.
 
djfresh47 said:
I hate the idea. I think the tournament should be a reward for a team having a successful season and to the conference champions not something that average teams get into because the field is expanded. People like to see a cinderella team go far in the tournament but I also like seeing the best teams play.

Agreed. Plus, 128 teams? That is ridiculous. Too many games. Keep it the way it is. If it ain't broken, don't fix it.
 
Id agree to adding maybe 5 more teams because it seems like 5 teams get ripped off every year....but not THAT MANY
 
If you expanded to 128 it would render the regular season meaningless. They would have to let in virtually every team of the major conferences. Coaches just want this b/c their job security often depends on making the tourney.
 
it's the best sporting event in all of sports- why must they screw it up??????????????????????????? 128 teams don't deserve to make the Tourney. 65 don't even deserve it. Just b/c of 1 fluke year by GMU in a very down year in CBB they have to start tinkering? leave it alone, it's great a it is. if they wanted to add a few more teams and have more play-in games for the 1 seeds then I'd be ok w/ that but nothing more than that.
 
It would be way to easy to get into the tournament with that many teams. I'd agree to add a couple more but double it? That is just dumb.
 
Way to make the regular season totally meaningless.

Not to mention you now have a concept that works. Why re-invent the wheel!
 
Back
Top Bottom