finfan54 said:what did TO do for the Eagles last year? OMG, you must be kidding right? If Mcnabb had just continued to throw to him, they could have won the game. Mcnabb is very overrated. Hail to Rush Limbagh!![]()
PhinsPhan said:Well said. It just stuns me the people that say they wouldn't want Owens for anything. This guy is one of the toughest competitors in the league and may very well be the best WR. He has attitude problems but to say that he is not worth anything is just absurd. Donovan had nothing without TO.
Fact is Marty Booker would be valuable to the Eagles. But, considering that they never trade unless they are getting a good deal player for player and not need. Eagles have always drafted based on BPA and they mostly trade the same way. They also don't panic, sometimes they should be panicing but in the long run they have not sacrificed their future for the current. In fact as far as teams go they have been successful and yet are still one of the best teams geared up for the future. The only way they trade for Booker is if they give us crap in return. Think about what they traded for TO and then ask yourselves if we would get anything more than a 4th round pick for Booker. Or some backup OL that is 3rd on their depth charts.
nyjunc said:No one is giving up a 2nd rounder for Booker or Boston, the best you'd get is a mid to late rd pick.
UCFinfan said:I don't know if anyone has mentioned him yet.... but, what is the deal with Corey Simon, is he holding out anymore? I know he would kill our cap, but would help out the D-Line a lot.
phunwin said:Actually, the trade that would make the most sense is to send Philly a RB, not a WR. If Correll Buckhalter is done, and he may be, they will want a bigger back to bear some of the load. Ricky Williams (once he gets up to 225 or so) and Lamar Gordon (228#) both fill the bill. The Eagles are one of the few teams that might be in a position to overlook the fact that Williams will miss four games. They're looking for a complementary part, not an answer to their prayers, and could surely get by in the short term with what they have.
I'd happily take a conditional draft pick for one of those two. Given all the problems they're having with TO, they might prefer Gordon, to minimize the number of headcases in camp.
ckparrothead said:That is not a very realistic trade at all.
If you want to get technical about it, it is because his value to other teams is higher right now than his value to us, since his value to us is represented by the difference between his value and the value of the "next best option" (which would be Boston, or Gilmore)...while his value to a team like the Eagle is the difference between Booker's value and the value of their "next best option" and since our "next best option" is plausibly better than theirs, the disparity creates the possibility for trade.