Re-read I said "exceptions" I'm sorry I thought you could have figured out that I meant the Patriots and Panthers. Those teams are the exception, those are the teams that have the depth, but can you say that NE thought they could win with 11 starters gone throughout the season? Belichek(sp) said in several interviews that it's very unusual. I and alot others beleive coaching and scheme design had alot to do with players success, but that's another thread.
Now look whats happening to both teams, they're being picked apart like a dead dear on the side of the road. NE will survive because they have alot of draft picks but lets see how the Panthers do? There is plain a simply not enough talent to go around to every team for quality starters and depth, it's a balancing act.
Yeah sure I could go over the injury reports for the last ten SBs but honestly arguing with you about this isn't worth the time and effort (no offense) but like I said, you take those injuries and place them at other positions are the results the same?
If they lost a WR and that's what position they were thin at, would that of effected them more than lets say CB where they are deep at? Sure it would. Every team goes into the season crossing their fingers hoping for no injuries, then if there is they hope it's at a position where they have quality depth, not where they are thin.
Any coach, GM or player will and have said, the key to winning is to remain healthy. Why do they say that? Because they know they are not deep at every position, it's impossible.
Of course we all want quality depth at every position, but realistically we can't do that today because of the cap. Of course there are times when teams get lucky.
My question is what would you do with the current cap situation the Fins are in to get the starters we need and the quality depth?
And I appoligize for the moron name, I meant that to come out differently than it did, after I read it I realized it. I'm a better poster than that, my bad.