Merged: What if we let the clock run out on draft day? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Merged: What if we let the clock run out on draft day?

Green Phin

Starter
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
434
Reaction score
1
In his latest column on SI.com, Peter King analyzes the possibility of the Dolphins letting the clock run on draft day.
"Five points:
1. I don't think Bill Parcells and Jeff Ireland know for sure who they want yet.
2. The only way a strategy like this would be smart would be if the Dolphins liked one or two other players nearly as much as they liked Long.
3. I hear Eric Mangini and Jets personnel met with Long in Charlottesville on Monday night. Hmmmm. Probably simple fact-finding. But imagine, Jets fans, a front three of 285-pound Shaun Ellis, 330-pound (they hope) Kris Jenkins and 275-pound Long. Not to rumor-monger, but if the Jets, who pick sixth, fell in love with Long, could they give Parcells enough to entice him to trade out of the pick?
4. I asked the agent for Long, Marvin Demoff, how he'd respond if he got wind that Miami, or any other team, was passing expressly to pay Long less. He said he'd treat the pick as if it were the first overall pick, because clearly the Dolphins would value him as the number one pick but would be positioning themselves simply to pay less.
5. The draft's not as fun as it was even a decade ago, when trades at the top were so common. Now, because no one wants to pay the first overall pick $35 million guaranteed (approximately what it will take to sign the first pick this year), trades are much less likely."

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/03/18/mmqbte/index.html

If we like more than one candidate, my strategy would be to pick whoever agrees to a contract first.

What do you think?
 
I think its a stupid idea(no offense) that would only prolong a hold out over a contract. Its also an idea that seems to come up on a weekly basis the two months leading up to the draft.
 
I think its a stupid idea(no offense) that would only prolong a hold out over a contract. Its also an idea that seems to come up on a weekly basis the two months leading up to the draft.

yup.
 
Fins to let time run out for 1st overall pick???

In Peter King's Monday Morning QB - Tuesday Edition he writes about the possibilty of letting the time run out for our pick, and take a player a couple spots down to save on money, especially if we know Chris Long will be there. Very interesting scenario, but highly unlikely if you ask me.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/03/18/mmqbte/index.html
 
Think it has only happened once. But the player we draft if we did that would probably hold out because their case would be that they were still picked with the 1st overall pick, even though they wouldnt be picked actually overall.
 
I think the Vikings tried this a few years ago...but not on purpose....time just ran out on them. Is it written in the rules somewhere that the first pick is gauranteed $35 million? Maybe we could draft a player # 1 and trade him right afterwards (like Matt Ryan if we know Atlanta just has to have him). If we do let the time run out what happens?? Do we get the 2nd pick, what if we decide to let the time run out a few times?
 
interesting strategy but honestly like the article said the agents will try to suck every penny out of the dolphins for whoever they pick...
 
I think that:

a) Peter King is an idiot. I've never held back my disdain for Peter King, and I won't make an exception now. His coffee stained, pink-hatting, tv-laced idiocy is not even worthy of biomass for renewable energy.

b) Bad idea. Makes absolutely no difference whatsoever if we pass, we'll still be paying #1 overall. We're only going to get a holdout and formal complaint lodged against the team.
 
I think that:

a) Peter King is an idiot. I've never held back my disdain for Peter King, and I won't make an exception now. His coffee stained, pink-hatting, tv-laced idiocy is not even worthy of biomass for renewable energy.

b) Bad idea. Makes absolutely no difference whatsoever if we pass, we'll still be paying #1 overall. We're only going to get a holdout and formal complaint lodged against the team.

He really is a jackass and his analysis is below mediocre at best...

2 years ago he used to put the weekly and overall record of his picks in SI.com. He stopped doing it because he sucks nuts at picking games...

Although if he has a good week, you will see his record, bad weeks, he doesnt post it...
 
He really is a jackass and his analysis is below mediocre at best...

2 years ago he used to put the weekly and overall record of his picks in SI.com. He stopped doing it because he sucks nuts at picking games...

Although if he has a good week, you will see his record, bad weeks, he doesnt post it...

I'm sure he loved this past season - he could click the checkbox next to win for his Patriots and they held up until Feb ;)
 
Peter King has some good info once in a while

but his style and hubris make him unreadable

he is a bigger tool than Don Banks, quite an accomplishment
 
Not going to happen because it would be seen as weakness and incompetency, and Parcells isn't going to let his watch be tainted with those words before even a single snap has happened.

As for a strategy, it might work actually, but you'd certainly be setting up the pick for a holdout and a dud of a rookie season.

I'd like to trade down, but i don't see it happening. Someone suggested whistfully Atlanta trading us their 1st and 2nd for the top pick, that'd be the best deal possible and I'd jump at that deal. Jake Long, Chris Long, Vernon Gholston ... any of those 3 would be better at Atlanta's spot than ours, and picking up an early 2nd rounder would be fantastic for our rebuilding.
 
Oh JOY! Yet another thread talking about this!

...please shoot me.
 
Back
Top Bottom