Mergedx3: 2006 Projected NFL Standings | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Mergedx3: 2006 Projected NFL Standings

emale2u1

Dolphin Fan Since '70
Joined
Sep 24, 2005
Messages
168
Reaction score
0
Location
Rockville, MD
I know I am going to get ripped for what you are about to see in this post, but before you start ripping, read this. I tried to come up with an impartial way of predicting the season.

What I decided to do was to take three different on-line power rankings of the NFL teams, average those rankings and create an average ranking with the best team ranked 1 and the worst ranked 32. Each week of the season, I played the schedule, giving the home team an additional 7 positions . For each game, I gave the winning team a +1 and the losing team a -1. For example, if the 10th rated team played at the 15th rated team, I would give a win to the 15th rated team. In fact the 15th ranked team would beat any team up to the 7th rated team (tie goes to the home team). At the end of each week, I adjusted the rankings by adding the +1 or -1 to the teams prior ranking and the re-ranking the new totals. This is by no means scientific, as I didn't back test my assumptions. I don't know if using a home factor of 10 would work better or worse, or if giving winning teams +2 instead of the +1 would be a better predictor. With that in mind (and I hope you aren't too confused), below are the records for each team and the final standings as per this system.

AFC
East
New England 14-2
Miami 12-4
Buffalo 3-13
NYJ 3-13

South
Jacksonville 13-3
Indianapolis 11-5
Houston 3-13
Tennessee 2-14

North
Pittsburgh 14-2
Cincinnati 7-9
Baltimore 7-9
Cleveland 3-13

West
Denver 14-2
San Diego 10-6
Kansas City 8-8
Oakland 6-10

NFC
East
Dallas 11-5
NYG 10-6
Washington 9-7
Philadelphia 7-9

South
Carolina 16-0
Tampa Bay 9-7
Atlanta 3-13
New Orleans 3-13

North
Chicago 12-4
Minnesota 7-9
Green Bay 7-9
Detroit 6-10

West
Seattle 15-1
Arizona 6-10
St. Louis 4-12
San Francisco 1-15



The bolded team is the division winner and the italized teams are the wild cards. Tampa gets the tie breaker over Washington due to is win at HOME in week 11.

Now I know that the first thing that jumps out at you is Carolina's perfect record. In fact it appears as if the rankings are both top heavy and bottom heavy. That is because there are always big upsets that tend to even out the standings a little. Leaving that aside, you can see which teams appear to have the easiest schedules especially when factoring in where they play their harder games. Carolina was only the average 4th ranked teams in my preseason power rankings, but even so they won all their games. This means that all of their games against high ranked opponents are at home. (Tampa was a preseason #12). If they are fortunate not to have major injuries, Carolina might just be favored in every one of their games. Unfortunately for us, New England also appears to have a favorable schedule. The team that really popped out at me was San Diego. Last year their schedule was murder, this year my system has them at 10 and 6. And that is with a preseason average ranking only 18th place. If they were ranked a little higher, they would most likely have been a wild card team or better.

Ok, give me your best shot. If anyone is intersted, I can send my spreadsheet.

Marshall
 
YOU PUT THE PATS ABOVE US?!


Just kidding. But I actually think we'll tie the Patriots. We did get strongers and they did get weaker.
 
So are you suggesting that there won't be a single upset this season? Also, I don't recall the last time power rankings ever meant anything. I'm not trying to be a jerk, I just think this is completly unrealistic.
 
I realize that the power rankings are going to be off and that upsets do happen (i mentioned that in my original post). After examining the data, I agree that is the records are somewhat meaningless, but it sure does give us an early indication as to who might have an easier schedule (see Jax last year).
 
I think well be 10-6 and the pats will be 9-7

No other team will go 16-0 ! AMEN BROTHERS:dolphins:
 
New England with 14 wins??....put down the crack pipe...they will be lucky to win 10 games.
 
So much for parity in the NFL. Wow...5 teams 14-2 or better.
 
Roman529 said:
New England with 14 wins??....put down the crack pipe...they will be lucky to win 10 games.

I don't think they would be lucky to win 10 games. 10 games is about right. They'd be lucky to win 12 but I could see them winning any where from 9-11 games.
 
Like you mentioned, the main problem is that it is lopsided. In your system once a team is ranked in the top 5 it is nearly impossible for them to lose unless the go against another top team on the road, the same thing is true for the bottom teams in the opposite way. Overall it is a creative system, but not really practical.
 
i think linehan will get the rams back into playoff contention. hes a GREAT coach
 
i think one of the jets or bills will at least have a decent season. i mean neither one is in hopeless situation for next season.
 
Back
Top Bottom