Comparing MIA and DET PPG against their opponents is instructive.
OFFENSE:
MIA has scored 26.4 PPG against opponents who gave up 23.3 PPG or 3.1 PPG higher than average.
Over the past five games after the O turned a corner in London, MIA scored 30.6 PPG against opponents who gave up 25.3 PPG or 5.3 PPG higher than average.
In comparison, DET only scored 20.3 PPG against opponents who gave up 24.9 PPG or 4.6 PPG LOWER than average.
DEFENSE:
MIA has surrendered18.9 PPG against opponents who scored 26.2 PPG or 7.7 PPG lower than average.
In comparison, DET has surrendered a league best 15.8 PPG against opponents who scored 25.1 PPG or 9.7 PPG lower than average.
In sum, these teams both have elite defenses who can massively reduce opposing scoring, but only MIA has an offense which can score more than opposing defenses normally surrender.
Of note, the MIA D matches up almost perfectly with the one dimensional DET passing O. MIA has pass rushed past better OLs than DET to shut or slow down better QBs than Stafford.
MIA 23, DET 17
OFFENSE:
MIA has scored 26.4 PPG against opponents who gave up 23.3 PPG or 3.1 PPG higher than average.
Over the past five games after the O turned a corner in London, MIA scored 30.6 PPG against opponents who gave up 25.3 PPG or 5.3 PPG higher than average.
In comparison, DET only scored 20.3 PPG against opponents who gave up 24.9 PPG or 4.6 PPG LOWER than average.
DEFENSE:
MIA has surrendered18.9 PPG against opponents who scored 26.2 PPG or 7.7 PPG lower than average.
In comparison, DET has surrendered a league best 15.8 PPG against opponents who scored 25.1 PPG or 9.7 PPG lower than average.
In sum, these teams both have elite defenses who can massively reduce opposing scoring, but only MIA has an offense which can score more than opposing defenses normally surrender.
Of note, the MIA D matches up almost perfectly with the one dimensional DET passing O. MIA has pass rushed past better OLs than DET to shut or slow down better QBs than Stafford.
MIA 23, DET 17