Miami Dolphins receiver Mike Wallace says winning is No. 1, but concedes frustration | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Miami Dolphins receiver Mike Wallace says winning is No. 1, but concedes frustration

DKphin

DKphin

Active Roster
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
14,535
Reaction score
6,353
Location
Pattaya, Thailand
082413sptfinsae40-1.jpg


Wide receiver Mike Wallace, left, and quarterback Ryan Tannehill have yet to establish on-the-field chemistry in Wallace’s first season with the Dolphins. (Allen Eyestone/The Palm Beach Post)
Click to expand...
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/photo/...ns-receiver-mike-wallace-says-winning-/p23hc/
 
Man we didn't bring small ass Wallace here to block. He's our deep threat that's what he's known for so I dunno what this staff was thinking they were gonna use him for other than that. Every wr drops passes it's not a problem. What is a problem is his td production and deep balls. Both attributed to tannehill and his inaccuracy
 
I really did not think it would take a full season for them to get a feel for each other but it looks like that's the case. Tannehill has missed his fair share of deep balls and Wallace has misread coverage at times. Get it together you two.
 
If Ryan Tannehill is inaccurate I'd love to know who you consider an accurate quarterback other than maybe Peyton Manning on a good day.

Ryan Tannehill has a better accuracy percentage on balls 40+ yards in the air than Tom Brady. Tom Brady isn't accurate? How about noted deep ball guru Joe Flacco?
 
i think whats important to note is he is more inconsistent than inaccurate. but he's still inaccurate. I know we are all watching the same games. He tries to throw wallace deep every game, I've never once seen him hit wallace in stride with the ball in front of him. he passes the ball to wallace like wallace is brandon marshall. if we had marshall, he would work perfect for tannaheill. you talk about wallace fighting for the ball..how can you fight for a ball u have to run back to. wallace shouldn't be fighting for any footballs really. you should always hit wallace in stride..what good is his speed if ur just running cut back routes.. we should be throwing at least 3 deep balls a game plus intermediate routes to wallace. i know he's getting open the camera shows it. i dunno if its sherman or tannehill..all I know is the big plays are there but we aren't hitting them how they should be. once that happens, the offense is gonna be crazy
 
napsndreds said:
Man we didn't bring small ass Wallace here to block. He's our deep threat that's what he's known for so I dunno what this staff was thinking they were gonna use him for other than that. Every wr drops passes it's not a problem. What is a problem is his td production and deep balls. Both attributed to tannehill and his inaccuracy
Click to expand...

Wow seriously? It's ALL on Tannehill? Stop it. Tannehill has deep ball issues, but trying to pretend like Wallace isn't accountable at all for his lack of production is asinine. Just like Tannehill needs to hit Wallace in stride when he is wide open and streaking down the sidelines, Wallace in turn needs to catch balls that hit him right in the hands.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom