Miami Dolphins to officially part ways with Chad Henne | Page 7 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Miami Dolphins to officially part ways with Chad Henne

Vaark said:
Scoreboard would be being outscored by the Colts by their first stringers with a hobbled Freeney and no Sanders 17-0 in the last 1.5qtrs which translates out to at best an 8-8 or possibly the same 7-9 team the Phins were in 09 and invalidates any claims of deserving to be anywhere other than in the easy chair if not for the Colts and Bengals generosity.

The 09 jest post season is more asterisk*-worthy than Barry Bonds hitting records!
Click to expand...

This ridiculous "should have been 8-8" argument is such a load of horse **** and really needs to be put to bed.

The bottom line is, the Colts with all their starters in the game managed to put up 15 points against us in 35 minutes of football.
Its laughable when jealous fans of other teams try to paint the picture that we couldn't play with them in 2009.
If that's the case, explain how we managed to jump out to a 17-6 lead against those same mighty, unbeatble starters the next time we met them on the field. And we were we ahead 17-13 playing 7 minutes into the 3rd quarter of the AFCCG. Do the math ...
That means after playing their starters head to head for over 72 minutes of football (all in their building) they scored 28 points compared to our 27 points.

Sounds pretty even to me.

Its funny how they only took over the AFCCG game after WE lost our starting running back, driving in the 3rd quarter, and then missed a long FG attempt to set them up. In fact ... in his last two carries (including the one he got injured) Greene gained 14 yards, and we were running it down their throat. If Greene doesn't get hurt on that drive, we most likely go ahead 24-13 with most of the 3rd quarter gone and probably go to the Super Bowl.

Either team was in position to win that regular season game after 35 minutes, and it could have gone either way. To act like that wasn't the case, is just having your head in the sand ... and wearing aqua goggles.
 
truthbtold said:
This ridiculous "should have been 8-8" argument is such a load of horse **** and really needs to be put to bed.

The bottom line is, the Colts with all their starters in the game managed to put up 15 points against us in 35 minutes of football.
Its laughable when jealous fans of other teams try to paint the picture that we couldn't play with them in 2009.
If that's the case, explain how we managed to jump out to a 17-6 lead against those same mighty, unbeatble starters the next time we met them on the field. And we were we ahead 17-13 playing 7 minutes into the 3rd quarter of the AFCCG. Do the math ...
That means after playing their starters head to head for over 72 minutes of football (all in their building) they scored 28 points compared to our 27 points.

Sounds pretty even to me.

Its funny how they only took over the AFCCG game after WE lost our starting running back, driving in the 3rd quarter, and then missed a long FG attempt to set them up. In fact ... in his last two carries (including the one he got injured) Greene gained 14 yards, and we were running it down their throat. If Greene doesn't get hurt on that drive, we most likely go ahead 24-13 with most of the 3rd quarter gone and probably go to the Super Bowl.

Either team was in position to win that regular season game after 35 minutes, and it could have gone either way. To act like that wasn't the case, is just having your head in the sand ... and wearing aqua goggles.
Click to expand...

Makes you wish you had a QB that was a play maker, doesn't it...?
 
truthbtold said:
This ridiculous "should have been 8-8" argument is such a load of horse **** and really needs to be put to bed.

The bottom line is, the Colts with all their starters in the game managed to put up 15 points against us in 35 minutes of football.
Its laughable when jealous fans of other teams try to paint the picture that we couldn't play with them in 2009.
If that's the case, explain how we managed to jump out to a 17-6 lead against those same mighty, unbeatble starters the next time we met them on the field. And we were we ahead 17-13 playing 7 minutes into the 3rd quarter of the AFCCG. Do the math ...
That means after playing their starters head to head for over 72 minutes of football (all in their building) they scored 28 points compared to our 27 points.

Sounds pretty even to me.

Its funny how they only took over the AFCCG game after WE lost our starting running back, driving in the 3rd quarter, and then missed a long FG attempt to set them up. In fact ... in his last two carries (including the one he got injured) Greene gained 14 yards, and we were running it down their throat. If Greene doesn't get hurt on that drive, we most likely go ahead 24-13 with most of the 3rd quarter gone and probably go to the Super Bowl.

Either team was in position to win that regular season game after 35 minutes, and it could have gone either way. To act like that wasn't the case, is just having your head in the sand ... and wearing aqua goggles.
Click to expand...
yea well, if Nate kaedean would've made half of his field goals yall wouldn't sniffed the title game. So start throwing your kicker missing field goals and running back getting injured out the window. The colts that year wanted the perfect season and if it weren't for caldwell they would've had it. In contrast your coach didn't even think of making the playoffs before that game. So in conclusion you guys at most were an 8-8 team that year
 
truthbtold said:
This ridiculous "should have been 8-8" argument is such a load of horse **** and really needs to be put to bed.

The bottom line is, the Colts with all their starters in the game managed to put up 15 points against us in 35 minutes of football.
Its laughable when jealous fans of other teams try to paint the picture that we couldn't play with them in 2009.
If that's the case, explain how we managed to jump out to a 17-6 lead against those same mighty, unbeatble starters the next time we met them on the field. And we were we ahead 17-13 playing 7 minutes into the 3rd quarter of the AFCCG. Do the math ...
That means after playing their starters head to head for over 72 minutes of football (all in their building) they scored 28 points compared to our 27 points.

Sounds pretty even to me.

Its funny how they only took over the AFCCG game after WE lost our starting running back, driving in the 3rd quarter, and then missed a long FG attempt to set them up. In fact ... in his last two carries (including the one he got injured) Greene gained 14 yards, and we were running it down their throat. If Greene doesn't get hurt on that drive, we most likely go ahead 24-13 with most of the 3rd quarter gone and probably go to the Super Bowl.

Either team was in position to win that regular season game after 35 minutes, and it could have gone either way. To act like that wasn't the case, is just having your head in the sand ... and wearing aqua goggles.
Click to expand...

Why do you have a Miami avatar?
 
Vertical Limit said:
Well the Hard Rock will miss Henne. Dude was always the popular one there.
Click to expand...

Hard Rock?? How about the Hard Ons??

In a FN poll last preseason .... 70% of the Hard Ons said Henne was our Franchise QB!! ... that's pretty popular too!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom