Miami Herald: Armando: NFL title games a lesson in finishing | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Miami Herald: Armando: NFL title games a lesson in finishing

Perfect72

It's Only Happened ONCE!
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
665
Location
Florida
http://miamiherald.typepad.com/dolphins_in_depth/2015/01/nfl-title-games-a-lesson-in-finishing.html

Did you watch the two games on Championship Sunday?

If you didn't watch because you are a Miami Dolphins fan and your team has conditioned you that football season ends the last week of December then please take a look at what happened on Sunday because it serves as a lesson for what is highly important.

Finishing.

Sunday was a lesson in finishing -- a how-to and how-not-to.

The Green Bay Packers, an outstanding team by most accounts, did a terrible job of finishing on Sunday in the NFC Championship game. Leading by 16 points at halftime and by 12 with just over five minutes to play, the Packers all but had a Super Bowl ticket punched late Sunday afternoon.

And then they failed to finish.

The Packers collected their fourth interception of the day to seemingly seal a victory but safety Morgan Burnett personified the misbegotten spirit that possessed the team by simply falling to the ground with the pick instead of charging downfield for an extra 10-15 yards to get his offense closer to field goal range.

(He was obviously trying to avoid a fumble by going to the ground. He was, obviously, trying to play not to lose instead of pressing the issue.)

No problem. All was still good at that point for the Packers and the Seahawks had to feel deflated.

And then Green Bay coach Mike McCarthy, a gambler throughout the season, went into a shell. He has Aaron Rodgers, arguably the best quarterback in the NFL. He has a fine offensive line that protects Rodgers like the QB was Fort Knox. McCarthy also has an outstanding, winning receiver corps.

But against a stacked tackle box, McCarthey ran the football on first down. Ran the football on second down. Ran the football on third down. The strategy lost four yards. It took 72 seconds. Punt.

And then the roof caved in for Green Bay. Seattle drove for a TD. Green Bay still led 19-14. Then Seattle attempted and succeeded in recovering an onside kick. And then the Seahawks scored another TD and converted a two-point conversion.
Suddenly, the Seahawks led 22-19.

The Packers, now desperate, unleashed Rodgers again and got themselves a field goal to tie the game. Where was this before?

Anyway, the game went to overtime and Seattle scored a TD on its first possession. Game over.

And the lesson?

Well, the Dolphins had games against Denver, Detroit and Green Bay practically won for 55 minutes last season. And then breakneck comebacks happened. And losses happened.

It was as if nobody knew an NFL game is 60 minutes long.

Was it coaches going into a shell? Was it not having a killer instinct? Was it sudden lack of talent showing itself in the final five minutes after hiding for 55 minutes? A lack of execution? What was it?

All I know is no loss leaves a more bitter taste than a loss after a game that seems won. It is deflating. It raises questions both inside and outside the organization. And when it happens over and over and over it cannot be dismissed as sheer happenstance.

The AFC Championship game also is a lesson in finishing.

The New England Patriots demolished the Indianapolis Colts and in doing so looked nothing like the team the Dolphins beat in the regular-season opener.

The Patriots, everyone would agree, started slow and were not a very good football team early on -- managing only a 2-2 record the first four weeks. But they're 12-2 the past 14 weeks.

The Patriots grew. They found their identity. They settled players into roles that seemed better, right -- moving players around on the offensive line, making multiple lineup changes at running back, even playing Darrelle Revis differently later in the season than they did earlier.

This wasn't atypical. The Patriots often get better as the season progresses.

They seem to often finish better than they start.

And that is a stark contrast to the Dolphins.

The Dolphins are 5-3 in September the past two years and if that level had been maintained, the team would have been in the playoffs in 2013 and perhaps in '14 as well. But that didn't happen either season because the Dolphins finished poorly both seasons.

Miami lost the final two games in '13 and lost three of the final four in '14. A defense that was solid early in the season had, for multiple reasons, fallen off the table by season's end. And an offense that is young, that should be growing together, was struggling more at season's end than it did earlier in the year.

Opponents, it seemed, had figured the Miami offense out.

Look, I'm not going to blame a lack of talent exclusively. I'm not going to blame a lack of execution exclusively. I'm not going to blame the coaching exclusively.

I expect everyone knows all of them have conspired to make up late-season nose dives that all fans would rather forget.

So what's the solution to finishing poorly and not improving over the season like the best team in the AFC East does?

No, the answer is not deflating footballs, smart guys.

The Dolphins will again this offseason try to improve their talent. They will try to fill holes. They will address what they believe are needs, wants and must-haves. There's nothing new in this. My personal opinion is Miami's two biggest needs are cornerback and guards (one for certain, but perhaps two). Linebacker later, people.

The Dolphins must also study the approach of their coaching staff. What are they doing that habitually gets less rather than more production out of players late in the season? What can they change to change a now obvious trend? How can they finish close games better? Is it more aggressiveness on offense and defense? Less aggressiveness on offense or defense? Less Kodaking? Better clock managment?

When Sunday's game was over, Aaron Rodgers sighed and said, "We gave it away."

Dolphins fans know how he felt.


Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/dolp...ames-a-lesson-in-finishing.html#storylink=cpy
 
I sure noticed Green Bay's collapse and compared it top the Dolphins. Felt bad for my brother, he's a huge GB fan.

GB were coached as if Philbin was head coach. Miami Packers.

Sheesh!
 
Armando is not wrong. Seems like an unnecessary jab, but he's not wrong. The teams that won left it all out on the field. Fake FG, 4th down conversions, 2 point conversions, deflated balls, you name it Seattle and the Pats did it. My favorite quote from Wilson when he was crying after the game was "I threw 4 interceptions and the guys kept believing in me." That's powerful stuff right there. The Dolphins on the other hand are blessed with a loud mouth wife in Miko that says that the team is split on Tannehill instead of shutting their ****ing mouths and backing the only dude who is taking a beating every game and still getting back up to compete. The Dolphins get so down on themselves so quickly. The players don't push each other to live up to championship standards and the coaches certainly don't instill confidence in their players.
 
I've been reading the same article from Armando this time every year for the last 15 years. He'll be writing the same exact article 365 days from now. Nothing is gonna change.
 
Lol at playing coulda, should, woulda with respect to running on third down with a two score lead. By doing so McCarthy got the result he wanted, which was even if they scored a TD they would still be forced to have to attempt an onside kick. When your opponent is forced to attempt an onside kick you are still a huge favorite to win the game at that moment. If they attempt a pass and its incomplete, or worse, Seattle can still kick off normally after the TD.

What killed the Packers was that idiot trying to be a hero instead of just doing his job on the onside kick. If he blocks instead of going for the ball Jordy makes the easy catch and its game over.

The players decided that game on both sides of the ball. The Seahawks, as a team, looked terrible in the first half. And the Packers, as a team, looked just as bad in the second half.
 
I've been reading the same article from Armando this time every year for the last 15 years. He'll be writing the same exact article 365 days from now. Nothing is gonna change.

Blame the Dolphins for that.
 
Just goes to show you can outplay a team for 58 minutes and still lose the game. Seattle looked absolutely awful for most of that game, but kept somehow hanging in there. Enough that they had a chance for a miracle finish. GB didn't show a killer instinct. I was surprised they settled for a field goal on their first possession. They played too conservatively and it cost them a trip to the super bowl.

I don't remember who it was that said it, but I think it might have been Norv Turner or maybe Jimmy Johnson. Basically, the quote was something like this: "Rather than taking what the defense gives us, we take what we want to take." I love that philosophy and I think that's what separates the good from the great teams. Of course, you need the right players to be able to make that philosophy work.

So I guess that's the lesson for Miami. Play to win. Don't play not to lose.
 
Thowing 4 ints And then throwing a game winner isn't impressive. You can give Seattle credit but let's not go make Wilson this elite guy when only his team would allow him to even be in the game after playing the way he did . Wilson is exactly what his stats say he is. 3400 yards and 20 tds . Don't know why so many people Praise this kid. Praise the D . Not him . Sure he won the game ... After he threw 4 picks , didn't deliver and needed a fake fg to get a TD and then got an onside. Seattles D on the other hand is very very good
 
I've been reading the same article from Armando this time every year for the last 15 years. He'll be writing the same exact article 365 days from now. Nothing is gonna change.

Not until the team changes Dude. We have sucked for 15 years...
Meanwhile 2 Straight 3rd place finishes, and New England is in the SB again. Not much to do but talk smack and take jabs. Our Team is a Joke top to bottom.
 
Thowing 4 ints And then throwing a game winner isn't impressive. You can give Seattle credit but let's not go make Wilson this elite guy when only his team would allow him to even be in the game after playing the way he did . Wilson is exactly what his stats say he is. 3400 yards and 20 tds . Don't know why so many people Praise this kid. Praise the D . Not him . Sure he won the game ... After he threw 4 picks , didn't deliver and needed a fake fg to get a TD and then got an onside. Seattles D on the other hand is very very good

Wilson WINS Dude. Tannehill never has, Texas AM, Here, Underachieving. Hope he proves me wrong next year. Cant blame Wilson for Winning, beating out Matt Flynn, and LEADING his Team to the Big Time each year. Tannehill never beat out anybody. Just sayin...
 
Wilson WINS Dude. Tannehill never has, Texas AM, Here, Underachieving. Hope he proves me wrong next year. Cant blame Wilson for Winning, beating out Matt Flynn, and LEADING his Team to the Big Time each year. Tannehill never beat out anybody. Just sayin...

4000 yards 27 tds and 12 ints it's underachieving . You're mistaken
 
Just goes to show you can outplay a team for 58 minutes and still lose the game. Seattle looked absolutely awful for most of that game, but kept somehow hanging in there. Enough that they had a chance for a miracle finish. GB didn't show a killer instinct. I was surprised they settled for a field goal on their first possession. They played too conservatively and it cost them a trip to the super bowl.

I don't remember who it was that said it, but I think it might have been Norv Turner or maybe Jimmy Johnson. Basically, the quote was something like this: "Rather than taking what the defense gives us, we take what we want to take." I love that philosophy and I think that's what separates the good from the great teams. Of course, you need the right players to be able to make that philosophy work.

So I guess that's the lesson for Miami. Play to win. Don't play not to lose.

You need great players to make any philosophy work. Period. All the Patriots do is take what what the defense gives them and it works splendidly. The Seahawks do what they do regardless of what the defense is doing, and that works for them. The common denominator here is both teams have great players.
 
4000 yards 27 tds and 12 ints it's underachieving . You're mistaken

I'll give Wilson credit . Hey whatever he went to the sb twice . I like the kid. I just don't like when people say he's elite . Elite is Rodgers , Brady , Brees , manning and now probably luck . Maybe Big Ben can be in there he's on the edge . But Wilson isn't there with those guys . Maybe someday ... For now ... Not even close.
 
Ok so we lost three close games but we also won some close ones...over a whole season it's kind of a wash.

We aren't a playoff team mainly because we don't have better talent...close losses are a poor excuse for not making the playoffs.
 
Back
Top Bottom