The_Dark_Knight
Defender of the Truth
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2005
- Messages
- 7,195
- Reaction score
- 25
You know, reading everything in the news lately about Michael Irvin makes me wonder something. Why hasn't ESPN let Irvin go?
I know that it's comparing apples to oranges, but ESPN dropped Rush Limbaugh like a hot potato following his comments about Donovan McNabb without any due process or any opportunity to explain himself. Rush Limbaugh's remarks were not condusive to ESPN desired image, so they fired him.
Michael Irvin has been given every benefit of the doubt by ESPN. It just makes me wonder. Irvin has a drug history and now a drug pipe is found in his car. Is this really the image that ESPN wants to present?
What say you?
:feedback:
I know that it's comparing apples to oranges, but ESPN dropped Rush Limbaugh like a hot potato following his comments about Donovan McNabb without any due process or any opportunity to explain himself. Rush Limbaugh's remarks were not condusive to ESPN desired image, so they fired him.
Michael Irvin has been given every benefit of the doubt by ESPN. It just makes me wonder. Irvin has a drug history and now a drug pipe is found in his car. Is this really the image that ESPN wants to present?
What say you?
:feedback: