Minesotta | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Minesotta

D

Dphins

Seasoned Veteran
Joined
Aug 9, 2004
Messages
667
Reaction score
0
How about there two first round picks a second and Michell Bennett. I think Linehan wants Bennett anyway. We give them the #2 overall pick.
 
I would DROOL over that, even though I am not in love with Bennet. However I cant see them giving up three 1st day picks and a RB for Edwards...or whomever.
 
Maybe we can get them to throw in their 3rd as well as their 1st and 2nd in 2006. Oooh we could probably get that Culpepper guy too cause I know they really want Edwards.
 
caneaddict said:
Maybe we can get them to throw in their 3rd as well as their 1st and 2nd in 2006. Oooh we could probably get that Culpepper guy too cause I know they really want Edwards.
Click to expand...

I heard they were shopping Bennett for a third round Pick is there two first a second and a third that out of whack to trade up to the number two pick. I think we would come out slightly ahead on according to the deal according to the chart. So there is no reason to be such a wise ***.
 
We should swap Gordon. He's on the last year of his deal anyway. If we got Bennet, we would now have too many backs. We are drafting a back. We have no Franchise backs right now, and frankly need one.
 
Dphins said:
I heard they were shopping Bennett for a third round Pick is there two first a second and a third that out of whack to trade up to the number two pick. I think we would come out slightly ahead on according to the deal according to the chart. So there is no reason to be such a wise ***.
Click to expand...

Yes it is out of whack. Sorry if I was too much of a wise a**.

In all seriousness, they are supposedly offering SF both #1's their #2 and then SF and Minny would switch spots in the 3rd (Currently Minny picks significantly later than SF in the 3rd). So in order to give up both #1's and a #2 Minnesota is asking SF to throw something else in besides just the #1 pick (SF would need to move back in the 3rd).

Minny isn't willing to give up 2 1sts and a 2nd to move up to #1 without getting something extra in return so there's no way they would give it up straight up to move up to #2. Now you want them not just to give up what they aren't willing to right now. You want them to also throw in a 3rd and a starting RB.
 
caneaddict said:
Yes it is out of whack. Sorry if I was too much of a wise a**.

In all seriousness, they are supposedly offering SF both #1's their #2 and then SF and Minny would switch spots in the 3rd (Currently Minny picks significantly later than SF in the 3rd). So in order to give up both #1's and a #2 Minnesota is asking SF to throw something else in besides just the #1 pick (SF would need to move back in the 3rd).

Minny isn't willing to give up 2 1sts and a 2nd to move up to #1 without getting something extra in return so there's no way they would give it up straight up to move up to #2. Now you want them not just to give up what they aren't willing to right now. You want them to also throw in a 3rd and a starting RB.
Click to expand...

Yes but according to the chart Minny would have to throw a first round pick in next year to make it fair to SF and that is why the trade won't happen. I really was't that far off. Especially to go to the extreme of saying they should throw Culpepper and there third in too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom