"Moore is quicker with decision and has faster release then Ryan T" | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

"Moore is quicker with decision and has faster release then Ryan T"

Wouldn't be the start of a season without someone saying the backup QBs are better than the starter in some fashion or another.
 
We've already heard Moore could lead them to 14-2. All coaches must be idiots to not realize how much of a hoss the guy is.
 
Matt Moore has a better record as starting QB for the Dolphins and a pretty much equal QBR to RT. I'm still not convinced the Dolphins wouldn't be just as well off with him because four years of RT starting haven't given me reason to believe otherwise. Deal with it.

---------- Post added at 12:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 AM ----------
DuderinoN703 said:
We've already heard Moore could lead them to 14-2. All coaches must be idiots to not realize how much of a hoss the guy is.
Click to expand...

I'm 100 percent certain Moore could have lead them to 7-9, 8-8, 8-8, and 6-10.
 
I'm 100 percent sure Moore would have been carried off on a stretcher before he could have finished any of these four seasons.
 
From the article:

"I am seeing quarterback Ryan Tannehill typically taking more time than he has in the past in making his decisions in the pocket. I timed Tannehill's throws in both seven-on-seven (no rush) and team drills (with a defensive rush) today.

And while I am not going to tell you how long on average he took from snap to release of the pass because it is not my business to provide that information to the Seattle Seahawks, let me say the Dolphins starter typically took longer to make his decision and throw the ball than second-stringer Matt Moore."

My thoughts:
1. Timing a quarterback in non-contact drills at the beginning of training camp with non-contact drills may be the dumbest thing I've ever heard of.
2. It was the dumbest I ever heard of until the reporter said he wouldn't reveal the average time because it would help the Seahawks in week 1.
 
Spiff said:
I'm 100 percent sure Moore would have been carried off on a stretcher before he could have finished any of these four seasons.
Click to expand...

That's based on the assumption that Moore would have gotten hit as much as Tannehill. Yes Moore is definitely not as durable as Tannehill (nobody is), but Tannehill's decision-making and playing-style has led to more hits and more sacks than other QB's would have taken in the same span.
 
Sirspud said:
That's based on the assumption that Moore would have gotten hit as much as Tannehill. Yes Moore is definitely not as durable as Tannehill (nobody is), but Tannehill's decision-making and playing-style has led to more hits and more sacks than other QB's would have taken in the same span.
Click to expand...

Wait, so you're disregarding his post for assuming something?

Oh the irony!
 
First of all, Matt Moore isn't very good. Let's get that out of the way. But I will say that Ryan Tannhell hasn't demonstrated a considerably higher level of quarterbacking, than what Moore showed in his string of starts in 2011.

At all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Brumdog45 said:
From the article:

"I am seeing quarterback Ryan Tannehill typically taking more time than he has in the past in making his decisions in the pocket. I timed Tannehill's throws in both seven-on-seven (no rush) and team drills (with a defensive rush) today.

And while I am not going to tell you how long on average he took from snap to release of the pass because it is not my business to provide that information to the Seattle Seahawks, let me say the Dolphins starter typically took longer to make his decision and throw the ball than second-stringer Matt Moore."

My thoughts:
1. Timing a quarterback in non-contact drills at the beginning of training camp with non-contact drills may be the dumbest thing I've ever heard of.
2. It was the dumbest I ever heard of until the reporter said he wouldn't reveal the average time because it would help the Seahawks in week 1.
Click to expand...

Thanks for admitting that you don't understand the importance of decision-making and getting rid of the ball in the NFL game. Also, seeing as teams scout seemingly minute details of how QB's play so they can formulate their game plans, that information is actually something the Seahawks may be looking for before week one. Pass-rush schemes ARE adjusted for length of time a QB has the ball.

---------- Post added at 12:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:31 AM ----------
Yessir said:
First of all, Matt Moore isn't very good. Let's get that out of the way. But I will say that Ryan Tannhell hasn't demonstrated a considerably higher level of quarterbacking than what Moore showed in his string of starts in 2011.

At all.
Click to expand...

Better said than I have done. Thanks.
 
Brumdog45 said:
1. Timing a quarterback in non-contact drills at the beginning of training camp with non-contact drills may be the dumbest thing I've ever heard of.
Click to expand...

I disagree with this one. Even though I think people are maybe reading too much into it, it is information, and it is relevant to show that learning the new offense is taking time for the quarterback.

As for Moore being quicker with decisions through a week? Well, here is my question: is that a good thing? Because from what we've been hearing, the 2s have been getting dunked on in practice.
 
Anyone can make fast decisions. Doesn't mean they are the right decisions.
 
We all know Moore is a gunslinger. It's no surprise that he's getting rid of the ball quicker, he likes to throw the ball on instinct.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom