Manning will get you 2 years if you are lucky. Griffin will get you 10 years if you are lucky. Id take the higher ceiling and if all else fails we have Matt Moore
RG3 I just want a different approach for a change. Signing vet QBs may have worked some times for some teams but that worked for 1 season for us and that was it.
Tough question. If Manning is healthy and can put up the numbers he did with the Colts, then I roll with him for a few years and draft someone in the second round to groom for down the road.
With the understanding that Manning is completely cleared to play and is showing no ill effect then...
It is no contest. You take Manning. He is a Hall of Fame Qb that immediately will make everyone better.
RG3 is an intriguing prospect who is at least 1-2 seasons away from being a legitimate starter. Since he is far from being a sure bet I would say the cost of bringing him in is too high. We cannot afford to mortgage away draft picks for someone that is not a sure bet. We are better off adding Manning plus a QB to develop.
Tough question. If Manning is healthy and can put up the numbers he did with the Colts, then I roll with him for a few years and draft someone in the second round to groom for down the road.
Easily. But Peyton is gonna be 36 and has a NECK injury. So unless it's a stone cold lock that we're gonna get 3 vintage Peyton Manning years, I'm going with the long-term option. Think about this: the Colts are letting PEYTON MANNING go for NOTHING. Let the notion sink in. That's just not gonna happen if Peyton could still play at a high level after this injury. We've been burned too many times by signing or trading for veteran QB's with injury histories. Give me a young, franchise QB whether that's RG3, Flynn, or whoever. I want the answer for the next 10 years.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.