Mre bad calls/don't agree with rules.

[GRAPEAPE]

Anyone watch sunday night bore fest? Laverneous coles "td " catch near the end of the first half. Why is it when a Rb extends the ball across the line only to get shoved back it's a td, But when a WR clearly has control of the ball with BOTH knees down, then rolls over and bobbles a little but never actually loses the ball it's incomplete pass. This is got to be the worst rule I have ever seen. Regardless the ball broke the plane in clear possesion so why the difference. This is moreof a rant than anything I guess. Any thoughts?

 

[nyjunc]

It was the correct call, I don't agree w/ the rule but it was the correct call just like it happened to Chambers in 2002 at the Jets.

 

[dominizzo]

It was the correct call, I don't agree w/ the rule but it was the correct call just like it happened to Chambers in 2002 at the Jets.

it was not a catch no possesion

 

[nyjunc]

it was not a catch no possesion

He had complete possession and both feet in then the ball jarred a bit as he hit the ground, it was a good call.

 

[elandre]

i agree...
It was a good call unlike the stupid Roughin the Passer one against us

 

[Maynard the Hammer]

another rule i question

steelers vs. colts.

ben throws a pick, the steelers offensive lineman gets flagged for 15 yards for taking out the legs of a blocker on his way to the ball carrier

how dumb is that? the guy takes people legs out all game. why is it different if hes trying to make a play on an INT?

 

[@@@]

It was the correct call but its not a good rule why the rules aren't the same as anywhere else on the field is beyond me

 

[cnc66]

steelers vs. colts.

ben throws a pick, the steelers offensive lineman gets flagged for 15 yards for taking out the legs of a blocker on his way to the ball carrier

how dumb is that? the guy takes people legs out all game. why is it different if hes trying to make a play on an INT?

I saw that and thought it was a great play and a very crappy call.