my assumptions on FA and draft. | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

my assumptions on FA and draft.

S

SR 7

☠️ Banned ☠️
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Messages
8,755
Reaction score
29
I think we will Sign a G via FA, a LB, WR, a DB maybe, and a DT.

We will (IF WE ADDRESS THAT IS) address the LT, C, WR (if not FA), just MAYBE G if not FA, and DE/OLB via draft.

I'm hoping for a DE, LT, SOLB or Ginn/jarrett/Nelson/Landry round 1, then a C/LT/OLB in round 2 wiht just maybe a DB.
 
SR 7 said:
I think we will Sign a G via FA, a LB, WR, a DB maybe, and a DT.

We will (IF WE ADDRESS THAT IS) address the LT, C, WR (if not FA), just MAYBE G if not FA, and DE/OLB via draft.

I'm hoping for a DE, LT, SOLB or Ginn/jarrett/Nelson/Landry round 1, then a C/LT/OLB in round 2 wiht just maybe a DB.
Click to expand...

Haha that is kind of confusing, but I think I understand what you are saying. Also, I would like Ginn or Jarrett round one, preferrable jarrett. he would bring some attitude to our recieving core. not only that, but we would be young at wr with a lot of talent with him and hagan. Being at asu im definitely a hagan supporter.
 
ASUFinFan said:
Haha that is kind of confusing, but I think I understand what you are saying. Also, I would like Ginn or Jarrett round one, preferrable jarrett. he would bring some attitude to our recieving core. not only that, but we would be young at wr with a lot of talent with him and hagan. Being at asu im definitely a hagan supporter.
Click to expand...
your close i would just switch that order
 
ASUFinFan said:
Haha that is kind of confusing, but I think I understand what you are saying. Also, I would like Ginn or Jarrett round one, preferrable jarrett. he would bring some attitude to our recieving core. not only that, but we would be young at wr with a lot of talent with him and hagan. Being at asu im definitely a hagan supporter.
Click to expand...

Dude, Jarrett is a great WR but we need speed. How long have we gone without a break away reciever? You heard the announcers at times this year didn't you? From the booth or the stands, it was evident that nobody could pull away from the defense. We need speed man.
 
IluvJuMiami said:
Dude, Jarrett is a great WR but we need speed. How long have we gone without a break away reciever? You heard the announcers at times this year didn't you? From the booth or the stands, it was evident that nobody could pull away from the defense. We need speed man.
Click to expand...

We do need speed, but I thought that Chambers was our breakaway receiver? because if he isnt, then we definitely have two number two recievers and we definitely have to draft a wr in round one then. I was not impressed with any of our wr's or our te's this last year. I think we need major upgrading there this offseason. Haha who was our last breakaway reciever, lesli shephard lol. but in all seriousness, your right Ginn might be a better value pick at 9. Also, I love Ginn's return ability.
 
Derek Hagan is faster and had a better college career than Jarrett. We don't need another Derek Hagan. I think Hagan should start this year. Chris Chambers isn't a speed guy, nor can you depend on him to catch passes when wide open. If we have a chance to draft Ginn and don't do it, we are truly inept.
 
Elliott 1 said:
Derek Hagan is faster and had a better college career than Jarrett. We don't need another Derek Hagan. I think Hagan should start this year. Chris Chambers isn't a speed guy, nor can you depend on him to catch passes when wide open. If we have a chance to draft Ginn and don't do it, we are truly inept.
Click to expand...

I agree completely, and I would love to see that happen. we would also be infusing youth and alot of talent at wr for Cam to work with.
 
ASUFinFan said:
We do need speed, but I thought that Chambers was our breakaway receiver? because if he isnt, then we definitely have two number two recievers and we definitely have to draft a wr in round one then. I was not impressed with any of our wr's or our te's this last year. I think we need major upgrading there this offseason. Haha who was our last breakaway reciever, lesli shephard lol. but in all seriousness, your right Ginn might be a better value pick at 9. Also, I love Ginn's return ability.
Click to expand...
think about what that speed would do for our offense,we've never had a player that could take a hitch route to the house,,lets not even talk about how his world class speed would take that 8th man out of the box and allow ronnie to be a very dangerous running back,,,i'am not gonna even mention he was one of the most explosive return men in college football history which this franchise has never seen the likes of,,,,,i would say thats some serious value at no.9
 
yea thinking about it after so many months I am getting closer to being convinced that Ginn can be OUR Bush. He will garner so much attention and players that CC will be open, Hagan will be open etc etc. You leave Ginn in 1 on 1, throw him a slant pattern in sntride so he can take it to the house. NO SAFETY in this LEAGUE has 4.29 speed or close to it other then Troy P. so say bye bye to the nice guy cuz Ginn is dancing in the endzone!
 
Only if DC can be healthy cause joey won't reach him by the time he finishes his 3 step drop!!
 
Doesn't matter how fast any WR is if the OL can't give us time to get it there, plus the OL needs to give our RBs holes so the defense can't just key on the pass play. If we can fix the OL, our WRs should be fine. Chambers can get vertical for the high ball, Hagan has the speed, just needs more reps in the game, Booker proved he can run his routes very well this year, and Welker is your clutch safety valve. I think ther are bigger needs at #9 other than WR. JMO
 
Elliott 1 said:
Derek Hagan is faster and had a better college career than Jarrett. We don't need another Derek Hagan. I think Hagan should start this year. Chris Chambers isn't a speed guy, nor can you depend on him to catch passes when wide open. If we have a chance to draft Ginn and don't do it, we are truly inept.
Click to expand...

Ha! So true...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom