insomnia411
The world is yours
Since many of you have fallen in love with Pat White and the wildcat offense in general, I decided that I should write a thread dedicated to the proverbial "debunking" of this draft pick at 44, and this offensive package in general moving forward.
I won't take up a lot of your time with this post, but because of the fact that most of you have rebuffed my logic in my contrarian stance towards the wildcat and pat white, I felt that this thread was necessary.
The first point that people often bring up in their defense of the wildcat is the advantage that it gives us running the football. Especially now that we have White at QB because he will loosen up defenses with his ability to throw. While this might be somewhat of a valid point, I say that we now have a stout, talented and very powerful offensive line. Why not get into the I formation, do some serious damage with Ronnie and open it up down the field via the play action?
While putting the ball directly into the hands of your runner might give you a slight advantage running the ball, I think the Baltimore Ravens (and even the defensively challenged Broncos) proved that this kind of offense can be absolutely shut down if prepared for properly.
Now that Pat White is the "trigger man" in the wildcat, people have a new fantastical vision to look forward to in the trickery and passing prowess that can be achieved by such a dual threat in the backfield. My argument against this hypothetical and assumed success through the air has 3 facets.
1. When was the last time a small and weak-armed quarterback who came out of a spread option offense in college was successful against any NFL defense?
2. If we are going to run a spread style offense passing the ball, we are going to require a stable of explosive and talented wide receivers. Which as we all know if we think objectively, we certainly lack. (see Florida, Oklahoma, Texas etc.)
And #3. If we are going to pass the football, why are we going to put the ball in the hands of someone who's arm strength, accuracy, NFL preparedness, and all around skill set pales in comparison to our two quarterbacks already on roster? Let's play power football, put our two or three best receivers on the field, throw screens, go play action and let Pennington pick apart defenses. Forget this NCAA ****.
I think that I have summed up fairly adequately exactly why both the wildcat offense, and the Pat White selection is an overall waste of time and money for the Miami Dolphins. However, let's say for argument's sake that playing this kind of offense does give us a slight advantage in both running and passing the football because of the way that it keeps a defense honest. Why in the hell would we invest such a high draft pick on someone who gives us such a small advantage? With the #44 overall pick in the draft we could have further aided the defense, or built around our quarterback of the future - Chad Henne. You don't spend high draft picks on part time situational players.
All I'm saying is that we should be running the ball with our best runners, and passing the ball with our best quarterback. Pat White is neither of those two things.
Thank you.
EDIT : I'LL BE ROOTING FOR PAT WHITE HARDCORE AND I'LL BE THE FIRST ONE TO BE HAPPY ABOUT HOW WRONG I AM IF PAT WHITE AND THE "WHITE-CAT" OFFENSE TAKES OFF NEXT YEAR.
THANKS AGAIN.
I won't take up a lot of your time with this post, but because of the fact that most of you have rebuffed my logic in my contrarian stance towards the wildcat and pat white, I felt that this thread was necessary.
The first point that people often bring up in their defense of the wildcat is the advantage that it gives us running the football. Especially now that we have White at QB because he will loosen up defenses with his ability to throw. While this might be somewhat of a valid point, I say that we now have a stout, talented and very powerful offensive line. Why not get into the I formation, do some serious damage with Ronnie and open it up down the field via the play action?
While putting the ball directly into the hands of your runner might give you a slight advantage running the ball, I think the Baltimore Ravens (and even the defensively challenged Broncos) proved that this kind of offense can be absolutely shut down if prepared for properly.
Now that Pat White is the "trigger man" in the wildcat, people have a new fantastical vision to look forward to in the trickery and passing prowess that can be achieved by such a dual threat in the backfield. My argument against this hypothetical and assumed success through the air has 3 facets.
1. When was the last time a small and weak-armed quarterback who came out of a spread option offense in college was successful against any NFL defense?
2. If we are going to run a spread style offense passing the ball, we are going to require a stable of explosive and talented wide receivers. Which as we all know if we think objectively, we certainly lack. (see Florida, Oklahoma, Texas etc.)
And #3. If we are going to pass the football, why are we going to put the ball in the hands of someone who's arm strength, accuracy, NFL preparedness, and all around skill set pales in comparison to our two quarterbacks already on roster? Let's play power football, put our two or three best receivers on the field, throw screens, go play action and let Pennington pick apart defenses. Forget this NCAA ****.
I think that I have summed up fairly adequately exactly why both the wildcat offense, and the Pat White selection is an overall waste of time and money for the Miami Dolphins. However, let's say for argument's sake that playing this kind of offense does give us a slight advantage in both running and passing the football because of the way that it keeps a defense honest. Why in the hell would we invest such a high draft pick on someone who gives us such a small advantage? With the #44 overall pick in the draft we could have further aided the defense, or built around our quarterback of the future - Chad Henne. You don't spend high draft picks on part time situational players.
All I'm saying is that we should be running the ball with our best runners, and passing the ball with our best quarterback. Pat White is neither of those two things.
Thank you.
EDIT : I'LL BE ROOTING FOR PAT WHITE HARDCORE AND I'LL BE THE FIRST ONE TO BE HAPPY ABOUT HOW WRONG I AM IF PAT WHITE AND THE "WHITE-CAT" OFFENSE TAKES OFF NEXT YEAR.
THANKS AGAIN.