My unbiast opinion on talent in the east.. | Page 10 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

My unbiast opinion on talent in the east..

finsRback said:
I still can't understand why there are so many BILLs fans on this site???Let's see , I'm a really bored dolphin fan, maybe I'll go see what Bills fans are up to, I just don't get it........Are you guys part time dolphans? or are you fearing the return of the mighty fish? What's up?

It says your 35, Havent you stopped writing with crayons yet?

Shut the F up to those who keep asking why we are here. If you were a regular poster here, you would have seen the thread I sarted when I said its Boring this time of year and for the next month until camp opens I will sometimes be posting here.

If you dont like it tell the Mods to Ban us. Stop crying. They are only words that you read. Im sorry if I hurt your feeling sometimes.

When I posted that thread, EVeryone said Welcome and dont worry if you say something negative.

I guess they were lying.

Also, The Mighty fish? Dude, Is that your nickname for the Dolphins. LoL
 
Philter25 said:
Speaking of Miss Cleo:



Seems like shes all over the place eh Justa? :lol: Or you just wanna pick and choose when you see her?


.
Huge difference. Henry is a proven back. Crowder has yet to play a down in the NFL. :tongue:


Philter25 said:
Right. Cause Zach stunk last year. You can argue the age all you want, fact of the matter was he was one of the better LBs last year and played on a horrible team and saw the field a LOT. He didnt get worn out last year and he produced playing MLB for a team that had NO offense and was on the field a LOT. Seau on the other hand isnt better than Takeo so I wont even argue or imply that..
I never said Zach stunk last year. He was doing fine until he got injured. He just wasn't dominant. He isn't and never was a game breaker.
__________________
 
nick1 said:
I suppose you think your LBs dominate? your obviuosly biased... who is better JT or the best DE on your team?
Biased? There are some finfans who agree w/ me are they biased too? :rolleyes: . JT? I wasn't talking about your DE's.
 
Justasportsfan said:
Huge difference. Henry is a proven back. Crowder has yet to play a down in the NFL. :tongue:
Henry isn't proven, he's had 2 years out of 4 where he's rushed for 1,000+ yards. He's always injured too, I don't know about you but I don't want a back who's been injured and only has 2 out of 4 years 1,000 yards rushing. If he's so proven then why did he lose his job to a rookie? next debate
 
I don't like how you have The Jets ahead of us in the RunningBack Department. We got Ricky WIlliams and Ronnie Brown. They got an Old Curtis Martin. and a decent L.Jordan. Or Buffalo being ahead of us...with W. Mcgahee and Travis Henry
 
BringBackShula said:
I don't like how you have The Jets ahead of us in the RunningBack Department. We got Ricky WIlliams and Ronnie Brown. They got an Old Curtis Martin. and a decent L.Jordan. Or Buffalo being ahead of us...with W. Mcgahee and Travis Henry

Lamont Jordan is a raider. ronnie brown is a rookie. Ricky is a pothead quitter who isn't in shape, isn't even with the team yet, and has 4 games to sit on his ***.

McGahee has the most going for him now, he's proven he can dominate an NFL game, and he's young.
 
Justasportsfan said:
Biased? There are some finfans who agree w/ me are they biased too? :rolleyes: . JT? I wasn't talking about your DE's.
let's get to why you don't think Zach Thomas is HOF worthy? he's played 9 years and has posted 100+ tackles in 8 of those 9 years and the one year he didn't he posted 99 tackles. in his career he has 13.5 sacks, 15 INTs, has forced 11 fumbles, and has scored 4 TDs. So why isn't he HOF worthy?
 
nick1 said:
Henry isn't proven, he's had 2 years out of 4 where he's rushed for 1,000+ yards. He's always injured too, I don't know about you but I don't want a back who's been injured and only has 2 out of 4 years 1,000 yards rushing. If he's so proven then why did he lose his job to a rookie? next debate
:rofl3: . He's more proven than Brown. If Henry didn't go down w/ an injury and had the same amount of carries, he would've had more yards than RW in his last season. Henry was a probowler . Crowder hasn't doen squat . Do you even see the flaw in your logic? :lol:
 
nick1 said:
let's get to why you don't think Zach Thomas is HOF worthy? he's played 9 years and has posted 100+ tackles in 8 of those 9 years and the one year he didn't he posted 99 tackles. in his career he has 13.5 sacks, 15 INTs, has forced 11 fumbles, and has scored 4 TDs. So why isn't he HOF worthy?
You must've missed the thread where most of your fellow finfans think he has to do more before he should be considered a HOF'er. It was last week. Go do a search.

You have lots to learn :D.
 
BringBackShula said:
I don't like how you have The Jets ahead of us in the RunningBack Department. We got Ricky WIlliams and Ronnie Brown. They got an Old Curtis Martin. and a decent L.Jordan. Or Buffalo being ahead of us...with W. Mcgahee and Travis Henry

Correction... the Jets have an old curtis martin, and I forget how many yards that old curtis martin put up last year.

The jets have the better RBs than us UNTIL proven. We theoretically have better depth than the Jets with a possible RW as our #2 back and we have the youth advantage with Brown... however until Brown OR Williams prove they can carry/still carry the ball in the NFL, we have an unproven RB corps. I said the same thing about McGahee last year....

Right now the Bills have the best RB corps with Henry and McGahee.... however that will change once/if Henry is traded.
 
BringBackShula said:
I don't like how you have The Jets ahead of us in the RunningBack Department. We got Ricky WIlliams and Ronnie Brown. They got an Old Curtis Martin. and a decent L.Jordan. Or Buffalo being ahead of us...with W. Mcgahee and Travis Henry
As of today, Henry is still on our roster and RW isn't on yours. I think that's where people made their basis from.
 
Justasportsfan said:
:rofl3: . He's more proven than Brown. If Henry didn't go down w/ an injury and had the same amount of carries, he would've had more yards than RW in his last season. Henry was a probowler . Crowder hasn't doen squat . Do you even see the flaw in your logic? :lol:
I thought you just said the pro bowl is a popularity contest? why the flip flop? No agruement that he is more proven then Brown or Crowder but he's not good enough to trade a 2nd or 3rd for like the Bills wanted for him. he's not that proven and he's not more proven then RW is
 
Justasportsfan said:
Huge difference. Henry is a proven back. Crowder has yet to play a down in the NFL. :tongue:

I wasnt talking about Henry... I was talking about his Miss Cleo prediction on RW...... which is what I bolded. I see no reason why the league's leading rusher can not handle the #2 role after taking a year off.
 
Justasportsfan said:
You must've missed the thread where most of your fellow finfans think he has to do more before he should be considered a HOF'er. It was last week. Go do a search.

You have lots to learn :D.
why? whats your agruement? stop using other fans to dance around the question
 
nick1 said:
let's get to why you don't think Zach Thomas is HOF worthy? he's played 9 years and has posted 100+ tackles in 8 of those 9 years and the one year he didn't he posted 99 tackles. in his career he has 13.5 sacks, 15 INTs, has forced 11 fumbles, and has scored 4 TDs. So why isn't he HOF worthy?

Those numbers don't get you in the HOF.
 
Back
Top Bottom