What is this 5 star vs 4 star nonsense? I've seen others mention this too, and it's the most irrelevant thing I've ever heard of when evaluating a player entering the draft. Patrick Willis, and Luke Keuchly were both 3 star recruits, players can vastly improve from HS to college then Vastly improve from college to the pros. The same can be said in reverse as well... 5 star recruits who don't amount to anything. Ronald Curry was a 5 star abd widely regarded as a better prospect than Michael Vick going into college, with people saying he could be the first person to play in the NFL and the NBA and then did didly squat at UNC in both sports.