Newest Mock | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Newest Mock

please end the *mocks*....unless BP posts a *mock*...it means nothing.
 
It means something because that is the website that i write for and conduct interviews for. The editor of this site is extremely knowledgable, and mocks do mean something to many fans. maybe not you, and if it doesnt, not sure why you chimed in, but does to many other fans.
 
Ironically, I definitely don't see us taking Flowers because of his character issues, however I expect him to go higher than he is listed there anyway.
 
InTheHole said:
please end the *mocks*....unless BP posts a *mock*...it means nothing.
Click to expand...

I agree with you that mocks are pretty pointless in the grand scheme of things. IMO, all these draft "experts" on such sites simply keep changing their mock versions enough times until they have put a number of different versions out there simply so they can look back and reference the one that was the most accurate in the end to prove their accuracy.

However, regardless of the rankings, some of these people do produce good information and scouting about these prospects and that's why people enjoy seeing them and posting them for others to see.

In addition, it is the "draft forum".
 
My point exactly, if you dont want to read MOCKS, stay out of the draft forum.

Secondly, why not draft flowers due to the character issues, didnt Parcells just sign Kircus, the same guy that was arrested in Denver last year and cut for his "character issues"??
 
the pick I dont agree with is Hawkins in the 3rd hes too small and we need a tight end more and there will be better tight ends at that spot.. Rather pick up a sleeper wr later
 
ottie35 said:
My point exactly, if you dont want to read MOCKS, stay out of the draft forum.

Secondly, why not draft flowers due to the character issues, didnt Parcells just sign Kircus, the same guy that was arrested in Denver last year and cut for his "character issues"??
Click to expand...

Well thats assuming you think a potential 5th WR will make the team in the first place and is not just camp fodder. Big difference between that and a high draft pick.
 
Motion said:
Well thats assuming you think a potential 5th WR will make the team in the first place and is not just camp fodder. Big difference between that and a high draft pick.
Click to expand...

I dont care what he is, Parcells picked him up and is giving him a paycheck......
 
ottie35 said:
I dont care what he is, Parcells picked him up and is giving him a paycheck......
Click to expand...

You posted the mock looking for feedback, I gave my opinion. No need to get defensive.
 
Sorry, it may have came across defensively, i ready your quote wrong. I just meant that why does anyone think that he wont sign another guy with character issues if he has done it more than once already?
 
ottie35 said:
My point exactly, if you dont want to read MOCKS, stay out of the draft forum.

Secondly, why not draft flowers due to the character issues, didnt Parcells just sign Kircus, the same guy that was arrested in Denver last year and cut for his "character issues"??
Click to expand...


Exactly! The title of the thread say'd "Mock"...u dont like it? Go read a Ronnies a bust thread.
 
Yeah, Dan Connor goes one pick AFTER we pick Brohm? I certainly see that as realistic------NOT

Where do these guys come up with this BS...I mean, getting and earning a paycheck should be contingent on some sort of competency of doing your job..Sorry, but I dont see any of that with this pick at 32!
 
I feel the anger...what do mock drafts really accomplish? and to the genius who says not to come to the draft forum..you don`t have to rehash *mock* drafts to post here...offer opinions, info, and possible draft moves...does not mean you have to rehash mock drafts....anybody can hit 50% or better on picks in the first round and less than 25% in the 2nd and 3rd rounds....
 
If Manningham is still there at #57, I hope there's no way we pass on him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom