Kinda interesting they dwell on this comparison.
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80f887d7&campaign=ec0009
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80f887d7&campaign=ec0009
Nicks is too slow to be a #1 WR. He could be solid, but we also have 3 other guys that are solid.
Nicks brings somethingto the table that none of the others bring. He is more than fast enough to be a numbe one.
Nicks is too slow to be a #1 WR. He could be solid, but we also have 3 other guys that are solid.
Hakeem Nicks deserves a better comparison than that. Nicks and Chambers are nowhere near the same players. Nicks reminds me more of Michael Irvin, sans the off field baggage.
I still says he no #1 especially in our offensive style
Why's that? What makes our offense unable to accommodate his style of play? Nicks comes from one of the most pro-ready college offenses in the nation, he has great initial quickness, excellent hands, good leaping ability, god strength and good size. There's nothing about our offense that doesn't allow to play a wide receiver like that. Consider Nicks & Ginn with Cam and Bess in the slots and London coming out as our big receiver. That's an excellent set with all (5) of them complementing each other.
The difference is Irvin was a sure fire first rounder, taken 11th in the first round...Nicks isn't.
ur comparing him to smeone coming into a draft 15 yrs ago or whatever?
if you want to mention that, put the players coming from taht draft into affect as well and consideration.
oh btw, Boldin wasn't a 1st round pick Ocho wasn't a top 11 pick, Bowe is very good wasn't a top 11 pick, moss a great wasn't a top 11 pick etc.
so saying he went 11 is irrelivant.