NFL goal line and ball position technology | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

NFL goal line and ball position technology

Sons Of Shula

not a dull boy
☠️ Banned ☠️
Club Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2013
Messages
19,509
Reaction score
3,406
Location
Room #237
Many sports are implementing technology that is able to track the ball's position throughout the game. Hockey was able to figure it out almost 20 years ago using the not so popular lighted puck. Tennis uses Hawk Eye to track the ball and to determine whether or not the ball is in or out. Soccer uses several systems based either on camera-tracking or magnetic field sensors that include Hawk Eye, Cairos GLT, Goal Minder and Goal Ref.

So why not the most popular billion dollar sports industry in the USA? :idk:

He certainly doesn't have a clue.
referee.jpg



Instead the NFL seemingly prefers metal poles connected by chain link and old men. We're stuck relying on the most archaic system in all of sports guided by the most fallible factor: the human element.

4122655500_5835449636-flickr-alexabboud.jpg


The implications that simple human errors can have on a game, whether that may be a given first down when not earned or one taken away at a crucial moment, in a sport most often determined by inches is unacceptable. Not to mention the fact that many first downs and touchdowns happen in a pile of bodies which the ball is covered from view. We're able to track the football player now and display his path and speed. Why not use such information to track the ball?

It's hard not to think that sometimes the outcome of some decisions on the field may be influenced by outside factors off the field when given the advancement in these technologies and the ineptitude of the NFL to upgrade it's antiquated approach to this subject. It's time the NFL the caught up with future in sports and it's on-field technologies.
 
i agree with you that technology should be involved a bit more in the game of football... especially with camera angles at the goal line, as well as maybe some sort of technology for there.

but the one thing i still feel is that human is part of the game and should still remain part of the game. the metal polls being extended to see if its a first down, the excitement that brings to the men running those out, and watching the links extend to the fullest to either see the nose of the ball peeking past the poll, or coming up an inch short.. i love that moment, its a fun exciting possibly game changing moment that has been part of football forever!!! i kinda dont want that to be changed.

over the years technology has helped, obviously with reviews, and its been great to have the yellow line, and other lines added on television for us to have as well. i think the main problems that arise are the wording of rules that really confuse, or mess the games flow. when we dont comprehend why a call is made, or not made, because wording of the rules are so different, or keep changing now a days with attempts of making things safer for all, and honestly even easier for the offense. to see fundamental tackling being flagged, great catches that seem to be called incomplete, beautiful coverage by a corner back called pass interference even though there was no contact or the ball was thrown 5-10 yards behind them.. .etc. thats the type of stuff they need to fix or figure out.

but yes i do agree there are parts of the game that would benefit having more technology added into it... especially at the goal line!!!
 
Many sports are implementing technology that is able to track the ball's position throughout the game. Hockey was able to figure it out almost 20 years ago using the not so popular lighted puck. Tennis uses Hawk Eye to track the ball and to determine whether or not the ball is in or out. Soccer uses several systems based either on camera-tracking or magnetic field sensors that include Hawk Eye, Cairos GLT, Goal Minder and Goal Ref.

So why not the most popular billion dollar sports industry in the USA? :idk:

He certainly doesn't have a clue.
referee.jpg



Instead the NFL seemingly prefers metal poles connected by chain link and old men. We're stuck relying on the most archaic system in all of sports guided by the most fallible factor: the human element.

4122655500_5835449636-flickr-alexabboud.jpg


The implications that simple human errors can have on a game, whether that may be a given first down when not earned or one taken away at a crucial moment, in a sport most often determined by inches is unacceptable. Not to mention the fact that many first downs and touchdowns happen in a pile of bodies which the ball is covered from view. We're able to track the football player now and display his path and speed. Why not use such information to track the ball?

It's hard not to think that sometimes the outcome of some decisions on the field may be influenced by outside factors off the field when given the advancement in these technologies and the ineptitude of the NFL to upgrade it's antiquated approach to this subject. It's time the NFL the caught up with future in sports and it's on-field technologies.

Yesssss.

There is nothing more ridiculous than a bunch of old guys in striped shirts and white baseball caps to get a ball out from under a pile of 300-lb men and place the ball randomly and declare: 4th and inches.

I am all for the tracking technology.
 
Yesssss.

There is nothing more ridiculous than a bunch of old guys in striped shirts and white baseball caps to get a ball out from under a pile of 300-lb men and place the ball randomly and declare: 4th and inches.

I am all for the tracking technology.
Lebatard has been talking about this for YEARS.
 
Back
Top Bottom