NFP Sunday Blitz-Is Tannehill being pushed up the boards? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

NFP Sunday Blitz-Is Tannehill being pushed up the boards?

Fin Fan in Cali

Fins Up!
Super Donator
Club Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2004
Messages
59,751
Reaction score
93,643
Age
61
Location
Sunshine state
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/NFP-Sunday-Blitz-2109.html

And the teams that were in the market for a quarterback but didn’t get one, especially the Dolphins, Browns and Chiefs, might have become more desperate. So Tannehill now looks like a lock to be a top ten pick, and a possibility to be a top five pick.
But his stock spike was manufactured by one thing: quarterback desperation.
“Because the position has such a high value and because there is such a need to have a quarterback who is consistent and stable, people are reaching,” one general manager said.
Said a personnel director: “No one can tell you he’s a sure thing. But people don’t stick to their grades at the quarterback position.”
If people did stick to their grades, Tannehill would be a mid-second round pick, based on the eight personnel men I polled on Tannehill. None of them said they would choose Tannehill in the first round.

But it takes more than traits to make a prospect. The GM also said Tannehill does not have Luck’s feel for the game. A personnel director questioned Tannehill’s decision making. Others pointed out that he had repeated chances to lead the Aggies to comeback victories, but wasn’t able to. His record as a starter last season was 7-6. Against Texas, which was arguably his most important game, he threw three picks and completed 41 percent of his passes in a tough loss.
The real issue with Tannehill is it’s difficult to evaluate him because he has a limited body of work. Whereas Luck has 38 college starts, Tannehill has 19 at quarterback. He spent two plus years playing wide receiver. He is relatively inexperienced and probably not ready to start, scouts say, but if he’s chosen in the top ten he likely will be pushed onto the field anyway.
 
Thats all true. Teams are desparate for QBs. Phins have been desparate for one since before 2000.
 
Thats all true. Teams are desparate for QBs. Phins have been desparate for one since before 2000.
If we could trade down a few spots and still get a Floyd, then I would do it and package our extra picks to move back up into the first round and take Weeden or Cousins. The lack of experience and starts that Tannehill has concerns me at number 8.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Above is a dream scenario for me - coming away with Floyd and Weeden.
Let's hope Ireland shares my dream.
 
IMO, "QB desperation" is primarily a product of the media plus a few owners'/GMs' desire to sell more tickets. Christian Ponder and Blaine Gabbert going in the first round last year were perfect examples of the impetus to sell tix in IMO. If Tannehill goes in the first, especially in the Top 5/Top 10, it will be the same thing: an owner or GM wants to sell more tix.
 
I personally think any QB we get will sit for the year and start next year. I have a feeling we will be getting Cousins or Osweiler.
 
Tannehill and Weeden I think will both be gone by pick #22 in the first round. I dont think phins will draft a WR in the first round. they would draft a pass rushing DE/OLB or TE like Fleener before Floyd. they could draft WR in the second round.
 
Hope the browns take him at #4, then we go bpa at #8 and get Cousins at #42............
 
There is absolutely nothing new here in this article as it happens often. Locker, Ponder and Gabbert were all overdrafted last year because they are QB's.

Last year I said Gabbert was a 3rd round prospect "at best" going by his body of work and his tremendous lack of basic skills.

But he's a QB so of course he was overdrafted.

Hell, Miami has done the same, look at Pat White who was a 5th round guy
 
This article along with others here, seen this guy for what he is. A reach in the TOP 10. Its there in his body of work. And that Texas loss was bad, considering Texas was terrible last year.
 
Only two Quarterbacks taken outside the 1st round have had "success" since 2003. what makes anyone think the guy we draft in the second (if we take a qb in the second) will have a shot of changing that fact? the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. It's time we place the value on the QB position it deserves.
 
I say all these so called experts and scouts really have no idea what Tannehill Luck or RG3 will really turn out to be. Just look at the history or drafted QB's and where some of the best have been drafted (brady) and what the "experts" said about them. It's all a crap shoot
 
well look at the brightside, if we draft him and he fails at qb, we can try out luck again in about 2-3 years and try to convert tannehill back into a wr, so all hope wont be lost on the blown pick
 
well look at the brightside, if we draft him and he fails at qb, we can try out luck again in about 2-3 years and try to convert tannehill back into a wr, so all hope wont be lost on the blown pick

So a failed QB and sub par WR would be worth the #8 pick? ****ing Insanity!:crazy:
 
I don't want any of these quarterbacks. They all suck. I mean Cousins, Weeden, and Tannehill. The Dolphins should roll with what they have, draft Russell out of Wisconsin if they have to take someone in the 5th round, get best player available, and hope for Barkley next year.
 
Back
Top Bottom